Skip to comments.
Why Do Intellectuals Oppose Capitalism?
Cato Online ^
| January, 1998
| Robert Nozick
Posted on 01/27/2006 10:23:51 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-67 next last
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Why Do Intellectuals Oppose Capitalism?Because they can't control it themselves. Intellectuals are so smart they know that they can design and order the world in all detail to be run from a central capital where they live and teach. That is the whole reason.
21
posted on
01/27/2006 10:55:05 AM PST
by
arthurus
(Better to fight them OVER THERE than over here.)
To: rlmorel
22
posted on
01/27/2006 10:56:45 AM PST
by
MarkeyD
(Cowards cut and run. Marines finish the job. I really, really loathe liberals.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Why? Because, in most cases, "intellectual" should be set apart from the rest of the sentence with quotation marks.
23
posted on
01/27/2006 10:58:11 AM PST
by
Redcloak
("Shiny... Let's be bad guys.")
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Because they want to be able to allocate our labor and spend our money for us.
24
posted on
01/27/2006 10:58:51 AM PST
by
Little Ray
(I'm a reactionary, hirsute, gun-owning, knuckle dragging, Christian Neanderthal and proud of it!)
To: BenLurkin
Yep. They talk about things, but don't actually do.
25
posted on
01/27/2006 11:01:08 AM PST
by
kenth
To: Hypervigilant
Remember what The Great Communicator said, "Liberals read Lenin and Marx. Conservatives understand them."
26
posted on
01/27/2006 11:03:53 AM PST
by
oyez
(OK now.. What did I do with those dilithium crystals?)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
"...but those who, in their vocation, deal with ideas as expressed in words, shaping the word flow others receive. These wordsmiths include poets, novelists, literary critics, newspaper and magazine journalists, and many professors."
In other words, people who produce NOTHING; a characteristic of elitist socialists.
27
posted on
01/27/2006 11:04:27 AM PST
by
LIConFem
(A fronte praecipitium, a tergo lupi.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
The author has this backwards. Self-styled "intellectuals" are not necessarily drawn to leading opinion by advocation; it's much more the case that those opposed to capitalism are drawn to positions allowing such belief the illusion of intellectualism, in order to lead opinion. Big difference there.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
No doubt, some wordsmith intellectuals were cantankerous and questioning pupils and so were disapproved of by their teachers. We cantankerous and questioning pupils just grew up into cantankerous and questioning adults.
In my case, the process just yielded a cantankerous, questioning conservative.
Go figure.
29
posted on
01/27/2006 11:05:19 AM PST
by
thulldud
("Muslim Community Leaders Warn of Backlash from Tomorrow's Terrorist Attack")
To: E. Pluribus Unum
You I started reading this thinking that Robert Novak wrote it. LOL
30
posted on
01/27/2006 11:11:30 AM PST
by
Tribune7
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Intellectuals oppose capitalism because intellectualism is not a salable comodity. Intellectuals are elitists who believe that their thoughts should be valued above all else and since they know better than everyone else, the intellectuals believe that they should be running everything, not the leading capitalists.
31
posted on
01/27/2006 11:11:49 AM PST
by
Eva
To: Brilliant
Because socialism is simple enough that it can be fully captured and explained with words. The spontaneous order of a capitalist system, on the other hand, is simply too complex to be fully knowable or explainable by any human mind, no matter how bright it is or how good with language it is. It's easier to expound eloquently on something you understand than something you don't. Thus word people prefer socialism. It fits their gift.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Self styled intellectuals are thinkers not workers. Capitalism takes work on every level.
To: Brilliant
Mainly because intellectuals are generally among the ruling class, and as the ruling class, they are control freaks, and don't like it when they can't control everything. Capitalism by contrast, requires freedom and decentralized decision making. Bears repeating. Very well stated. Others make good points, but you hit the nail on the head!!
To: E. Pluribus Unum
To: E. Pluribus Unum
36
posted on
01/27/2006 11:23:03 AM PST
by
TASMANIANRED
(The Internet is the samizdat of liberty.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
37
posted on
01/27/2006 11:26:59 AM PST
by
frithguild
(The Freepers moved as a group, like a school of sharks sweeping toward an unaware and unarmed victim)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
To: arthurus
" Intellectuals are so smart they know that they can design and order the world in all detail to be run from a central capital where they live and teach."
And every time they get a chance to try it is an utter, complete failure usually resulting in the deaths of millions.
To: Tzimisce
In a Communist system, they reign supreme. Interesting to note that when communists take over a country, the first thing they do is kill off the "intellectuals".
40
posted on
01/27/2006 12:00:51 PM PST
by
GingisK
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-67 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson