Skip to comments.
The Pentagon Breaks the Islam Taboo
Frontpagemag.com ^
| Dec 14, 2005
| Paul Sperry
Posted on 01/27/2006 8:13:06 AM PST by bayouranger
Washington 's policy-makers have been careful in the war on terror to distinguish between Islam and the terrorists. The distinction has rankled conservatives who see scarce difference.
(Excerpt) Read more at faithfreedom.org ...
TOPICS: Australia/New Zealand; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; United Kingdom; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: cultofdeath; deathcult; globaljihad; gwot; hadeeth; hadith; islam; jihad; kkkoran; koran; madmo; mohammed; mohamud; murder; muslim; pentagon; quran; religionofpeace; swine; terrorism; terrorist; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121-129 next last
To: Leatherneck_MT
I guess someone finally woke up in the Puzzle Palace.The "Puzzle Palace" wasn't mentioned in the article.
CIA, DIA, and CIFA were.
101
posted on
01/27/2006 10:17:55 AM PST
by
ASA Vet
(Those who know don't talk, those who talk don't know.)
To: ASA Vet
ok the lost in space palace then.
102
posted on
01/27/2006 10:29:03 AM PST
by
Leatherneck_MT
(An honest man can feel no pleasure in the exercise of power over his fellow citizens.)
To: cgk
Now... WHY did it take them this long to look to the source?Because political correctness, when ruthlessly enforced as ours has been to date, takes on an inertia which is extremely difficult to overcome...
the infowarrior
To: USF
www.sperryfiles.com
There's one reason why we're SO far behind in the WOT.
$ + lack of pride = infiltration
104
posted on
01/27/2006 10:42:52 AM PST
by
bayouranger
(The 1st victim of islam is the person who practices the lie.)
To: null and void
105
posted on
01/27/2006 10:44:39 AM PST
by
sageb1
(This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
To: cgk
"Islam is an ideological engine of war (Jihad)," concludes the sensitive Pentagon briefing paper. And "no one is looking for its off switch.",A Predator worked just fine the other day.
Between us killing them and their attacks turning non-Islamists radicals against them, that is the off switch.
106
posted on
01/27/2006 10:45:18 AM PST
by
dirtboy
(My new years resolution is to quit using taglines...)
To: sageb1
Still pending. I will, if asked.
107
posted on
01/27/2006 11:02:29 AM PST
by
null and void
("Never place a period where God has placed a coma" --Gracie Allen)
To: Flavius Josephus
You need to include 'Islamist' in your tag line.
To: The_Republican
They're going to 'feel' a lot more 'put upon' when their counties are turned to GLASS!
To: onedoug
Pan-islamismPam-Islamism is a good name. I like to call it Islamic Supremacism, because it's reminiscent of the old White Supremacism and the KKK who hid under bedsheets while acting out their desire to get rid of anyone not like them, which is basically what these sand freaks do as well.
110
posted on
01/27/2006 11:54:05 AM PST
by
Flavius Josephus
(Enemy Idealogies: Pacifism, Liberalism, and Feminism.)
To: PeoplesRepublicOfWashington
As a friend of mine put it, in Islam not only is it OK to convert at the point of a sword, it's required.
111
posted on
01/27/2006 11:57:50 AM PST
by
Flavius Josephus
(Enemy Idealogies: Pacifism, Liberalism, and Feminism.)
To: CedarDave
To: bayouranger
The URL linked in the second post Thanks bayou, I saw that. I don't usually go to linked sites unless its too good to pass up. My preference is that the poster take some time and excerpt more than the first sentence. No big whoop.
113
posted on
01/27/2006 12:26:14 PM PST
by
subterfuge
(The Democrat party--hating American ideals for 60 years.)
To: CedarDave
To: bayouranger
"Strategic themes suggest Islam is radical by nature," according to the briefing, which goes on to cite the 26 chapters of the Quran dealing with violent jihad and the examples of the Muslim prophet, who it says sponsored "terror and slaughter" against unbelievers. Excellent post. Thanks.
115
posted on
01/27/2006 12:40:42 PM PST
by
Rocky
(Air America: Robbing the poor to feed the Left)
To: The_Republican
So why the move of bases out of SA?
Kuwait was closer?
116
posted on
01/27/2006 1:48:31 PM PST
by
UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide
(Give Them Liberty Or Give Them Death! - IT'S ISLAM, STUPID! - Islam Delenda Est! - Rumble thee forth)
To: The_Republican
Is it impossible for you to believe that some Arabs would NOT want American Military presence in their Holy Land?
With the permission of the Saudi government.
When you convince yourself of the validity of somebody else's claim of what is "holy" while they are free to disrespect yours, you have become their dhimmi.
NEWS FLASH: You are still in their "holy land". The whole planet is their "holy land" and they want even useful dupes out of it!
117
posted on
01/27/2006 1:56:11 PM PST
by
UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide
(Give Them Liberty Or Give Them Death! - IT'S ISLAM, STUPID! - Islam Delenda Est! - Rumble thee forth)
To: Flavius Josephus
"They don't have to BE occupied to Feeeeeel occupied." Ha! Someone listens to Michael Savage! : - )
To: jan in Colorado
Thanks for the ping Jan.
It's refreshing to see that some people in the government are waking up and seeing Islam for what it truly is. Maybe now they can get serious and take off the kid gloves when dealing with the Religion of Terrorism.
To: The_Republican
"Maybe they don't like foreign military in their country."
You mean the countries they took over by murdering most of the non-muslims?
120
posted on
01/27/2006 2:02:52 PM PST
by
RouxStir
(Peaceful muslim...The Ultimate Oxymoron!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121-129 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson