Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Again the tax and spend socialist are proven wrong - like JFK's & RWR's tax cuts - W's have had the desired effect of expanding the economy.

The beauty is that if we only reduced spending growth rates below GDP growth rates - surpluses will again be possible and sustainable long into the future - of course barring unforeseen catastrophies.

When will Americans hold the left responsible for their continued lies on the matter?????

1 posted on 01/27/2006 7:35:59 AM PST by Marxbites
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Marxbites

Nope. This article won't get any airplay. It won't be seen anywhere outside of FR and NRO.


2 posted on 01/27/2006 7:39:51 AM PST by .cnI redruM (Shame, not sanctions - UN policy on Iran)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Marxbites

There goes another argument by the leftists.


3 posted on 01/27/2006 7:44:09 AM PST by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Marxbites

Unfortunately the government went on a spending spree after these tax cuts just like they did after Reagan and have again masked the true effect the tax cuts had.


6 posted on 01/27/2006 7:48:16 AM PST by conservative physics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Marxbites
FOX news, Rush, somebody please, please do a report on this. Heck, GOP, why don't you take out a couple of FULL PAGE ADS in the NY times, Washington Post, LA Times and a couple of other red state newspapers.

The President can even make note of this in his State of the Union address. Folks, we have got to take charge of the debate on the economic front if we ever hope to get further tax relief.

GOP leadership - hear me on this. For every dollar you spend NOW on setting the debate and educating people on how the tax cuts helped bring in more money, it will save tens or hundreds of dollars in last minute campaigning.
8 posted on 01/27/2006 8:08:00 AM PST by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Marxbites

Does W and company know this?

What great data to report during State of the Union!

FR activits use your email power to bring this to the attention of "The Architect"!


10 posted on 01/27/2006 8:17:02 AM PST by The_Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Marxbites

Of course it did. And the dividend cut. Tax cuts always pay for themselves.

But they didn't pay for the socialism the phony "conservatives" rammed down our gullible throats!

Even Clinton reluctantly signed a cap gains cut. And he had a GOP congress to actually try to reign him in.


11 posted on 01/27/2006 8:23:58 AM PST by IRememberElian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marblehead17

ping


12 posted on 01/27/2006 8:25:50 AM PST by marblehead17 (I love it when a plan comes together.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Marxbites

I'm going to help circulate this one. I've got a few non-Freepers that would be interested. Thanks for the post because I know mainstream media won't call attention to it.


13 posted on 01/27/2006 8:32:20 AM PST by lilylangtree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Marxbites; ancient_geezer; pigdog; Conservative Goddess
...buried in one of its nearly impenetrable tables of numbers is a remarkable story that has gone entirely unreported by the mainstream media: The 2003 tax cut on capital gains has entirely paid for itself. More than paid for itself. Way more.

Why am I not surprised that:

1. this little item is buried in the report.

2. the media is ignoring it.

3. tax cuts work particularly tax cuts which increase the spending power of consumers.

14 posted on 01/27/2006 8:38:55 AM PST by Bigun (IRS sucks @getridof it.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Marxbites
...buried in one of its nearly impenetrable tables of numbers is a remarkable story that has gone entirely unreported by the mainstream media: The 2003 tax cut on capital gains has entirely paid for itself. More than paid for itself. Way more.

This leads me directly to the question:

What would happen if we entirely did away with this bit of subtrafuge called the corporate income tax?

15 posted on 01/27/2006 8:42:23 AM PST by Bigun (IRS sucks @getridof it.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Marxbites

EXCELLENT POST! Thanks!

The left will never acknowledge their collective folly. Taxing the "evil" "rich" just "feels" so good....they can't give it up.


21 posted on 01/27/2006 9:05:45 AM PST by Conservative Goddess (Politiae legibus, non leges politiis, adaptandae)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Taxman; pigdog; Principled; EternalVigilance; rwrcpa1; phil_will1; kevkrom; n-tres-ted; Zon; ...
A Taxreform bump for you all.

If anyone would like to be added to this ping list let me know.

John Linder in the House(HR25) & Saxby Chambliss Senate(S25) offer a comprehensive bill to kill all income and SS/Medicare payroll taxes outright and replace them with with a national retail sales tax administered by the states.

H.R.25,S.25
A bill to promote freedom, fairness, and economic opportunity by repealing the income tax and other taxes, abolishing the Internal Revenue Service, and enacting a national retail sales tax to be administered primarily by the States.

Refer for additional information:


35 posted on 01/27/2006 10:15:17 AM PST by ancient_geezer (Don't reform it, Replace it!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Marxbites
Spending cuts. Spending cuts. Spending cuts.

Generating more cash for Congress to steal and squander is just wrong. We need to strangle the cashflow, because these parasites just will never get it. It's not their money, and they can buy votes, so why would they stop as long as we find ways for them to steal more of it?

40 posted on 01/27/2006 12:59:20 PM PST by Hank Rearden (Never allow anyone who could only get a government "job" attempt to tell you how to run your life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Marxbites; ancient_geezer; n-tres-ted; Principled; Bigun; houeto; pigdog; Conservative Goddess; ...

FWIIW, the CBO has been dead wrong with virtually every estimate they have ever made about the economy!

The reason is they use "static" scoring for proposed changes in the tax code vice "dynamic" scoring. IOW, they refuse, even after decades of contrary evidence, to take into account personal and corporate taxpayer behavior in the face of tax code changes.

The "conventional wisdom" under the static scoring model is that when the government raises tax rates, revenues increase and when tax rates are lowered, revenue decreases.

They are wrong, of course, and Dr. Laffer is absolutely correct, as has been proven time after time after time.

The sad truth is that the CBO poobahs are tax and spend lieberals, and the Republicans, when afforded an opportunity to replace the CBO old guard in 1994 with FResh intellects schooled in dynamic scoring, blew it, and left the old guard in place.

Which gives you some idea of the magnitude of the problem we are faced with -- not only with the CBO, but also with the Congress!

For example, the static scoring model the CBO uses has resulted in some incredibly wrong-headed conclusions which the LIEberal/Socialist/Marxist Bastards in Congress, on K Street and at the Brookings Institute have used with manifest glee to trash the FairTax.

When you understand that the CBO wields incredible power in the House and Senate re: changes to the tax code, you will begin to appreciate the nature of the beast we are warring against.

Simply put, the CBO can make or break a tax code change, and for that reason, reform minded Congressmen and Senators have been trying to re-staff the CBO since 1994. Without success, I must regretfully add. The lieberal tax and spenders are still in there doing their bit to keep the income tax and the IRS alive.

To this point, they are succeeding.

We have all suffered mightily FRom their "handiwork."


42 posted on 01/27/2006 3:09:45 PM PST by Taxman (So that the beautiful pressure does not diminish!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Marxbites
Again the tax and spend socialist are proven wrong - like JFK's & RWR's tax cuts - W's have had the desired effect of expanding the economy.

Thank you congressman Bill Thomas. W was adamantly against a capital gains tax cut.

54 posted on 01/27/2006 5:13:54 PM PST by Moonman62 (Federal creed: If it moves tax it. If it keeps moving regulate it. If it stops moving subsidize it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Marxbites

Somehow I don't think the NYT or NPR are gonna report this...


81 posted on 01/29/2006 1:35:32 PM PST by Wheee The People
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson