Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Marxbites
Spending cuts. Spending cuts. Spending cuts.

Generating more cash for Congress to steal and squander is just wrong. We need to strangle the cashflow, because these parasites just will never get it. It's not their money, and they can buy votes, so why would they stop as long as we find ways for them to steal more of it?

40 posted on 01/27/2006 12:59:20 PM PST by Hank Rearden (Never allow anyone who could only get a government "job" attempt to tell you how to run your life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Hank Rearden

You are correct, spending cuts are just as important as tax cuts, but given a choice of one - I'll take the tax cuts which might force the starvation gambit.

As I think I once saw - the fiduciary pecking order is thus:

Spending one's own on one's self

Spending one's own on other's

Spending other's on one's self

Spending other's on other's

As you state - Govt has the LEAST incentive possible in responsible spending of the people's money.

The whole point of the article was that cutting taxes increases the cashflow from which Govt's take, evan at a smaller percentage rate = more revenue.


41 posted on 01/27/2006 1:58:24 PM PST by Marxbites (Freedom is the negation of Govt to the maximum extent possible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson