Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: petitfour
I don't necessarily agree that the lifeguards should be distracted by it, but if noone else can eat by the pool, then neither can baby.

Ofercryinoutloud. That's one of the dumbest arguments I've ever seen.

23 posted on 01/27/2006 7:04:05 AM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: r9etb

Lifeguards are responsible for what folks are doing around the pool as well as in the pool. That's why they are always looking around for children running or horsing around. They are the ones who have to enforce all the rules. If the lifeguards find breastfeeding moms distracting, then the moms must go. Just like disruptive children must go. The swimming pool is for swimming. If moms want to nurse by the pool, then they'll have to get their own pool. Or maybe they will persuade the folks running the Ann Arbor YMCA to fire the distracted lifeguards and allow the moms to nurse by the pool. I don't understand why they can't leave the pool area for ten minutes to take care of business. If they have other children at the pool, then they can take their children with them. Or they can plan on feeding baby before they go swimming and again two or so hours later. Do they not leave the pool for their other children to potty???


29 posted on 01/27/2006 7:15:29 AM PST by petitfour
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson