Posted on 01/26/2006 10:10:51 AM PST by maquiladora
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President George W. Bush on Thursday backed a Russian proposal to resolve a nuclear stalemate with Tehran and said the United States supported democratic reformers in Iran.
Bush laid out conditions for an "acceptable alternative" for Iran.
"That the material used to power the plant would be manufactured in Russia, delivered under IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) inspectors to Iran, to be used in that plant, the waste of which will be picked up by the Russians and returned to Russia."
"I think that is a good plan," he said. "The Russians came up with the idea and I support it."
(Excerpt) Read more at today.reuters.com ...
Ping!
Oy. He really believes this is what's going to happen?
President Bush, you're joking, right?
I don't know anything about nuclear power, is this a safe option for the West?
He floats it as a trial balloon, knowing the Iranians will reject it.
Of course not. But it takes the Russians off the table when the US acts. 'We backed the Russian plan. We are on their side. It is the Iranians who are unreasonable. That's why we had to nuke them.' At this point, the only friends the Iranians will have will be the French.
"He floats it as a trial balloon, knowing the Iranians will reject it."
It seems after reading an article posted on FR all I have to do is scroll down a few posts to find what I was about to type!
Exactly. The Iranians have to reject it. They're not interested in enriching uranium for energy purposes. The Russians get to feel like they're doing something constructive to head this off, and the President can have Iran essentially admit it's not trying to supplant its energy supplies, but build nuclear weapons.
Makes sense, I agree.
Doesn't matter, will never happen.
Its just another way to demonstrate to the squishy europeans how unreasonable Iran is on the issue.
I don't think you realize how difficult a war with Iran would be.
If he has to do it, Bush will do it, but he clearly wants to exhaust every other remedy possible.
Iran will respond by saying they are a sovereign country and will not be dependent upon another country, not even a friendly country. They will reject the offer.
moose... just so you know, this is the same kind of plan that the Clinton Administration came up to "resolve" the North Korean issue...
Thanks for your note.
ARTICLE: Spreading democracy and freedom, especially in Muslim countries, is high on Bush's foreign policy agenda. It has been criticized by some as a misguided attempt to impose U.S. values and political beliefs.
If any person has had the pleasure to experience the diversity of lifestyles, cultures and opinions of these United States, they would know immediately that it would be physically impossible to impose American political beliefs on anyone. In fact, American values are clearly opposed to restrictions on political beliefs. How is an American foreign policy engineered to foster global stability on the premise of respect for individual rights misguided? This is a totally rhetorical question... From your previous posts you've implied, that although American foreign policy may at times be unbalanced, it is by no means misguided.
I doubt he really believes that it will happen, but he is also expected to lend credence to diplomacy. Of course, his detractors will castigate him if he eschews diplomacy when urgency dictates action, or if he "outsources" diplomacy, or even if he explores all possible forms of diplomacy. He can't win with the Dims or the media either way, but he wins with himself and with rational people by turning over the stones as they crop up. When all is said and done, he will do the best he can as the situation continues to develop, and he'll do it for the right reasons.
My previous post as in the one on China? That's because someone implied India would somehow "ally" with China, notwithstanding the all-present border dispute, and the overall significantly great threat China poses to India, by way of its might, its assistance to Pakistan, and its incompatible political system. India's relationship with America is at a much higher priority in Indian political circles (barring the Left parties) than its priorities vis-a-vis China.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.