Posted on 01/26/2006 4:28:02 AM PST by Mia T
ON REJIGGING GALLUP'S LOSING NUMBERS FOR HILLARY
This is HARDBALL on MSNBC.
(COMMERCIAL BREAK)
[NOTE: My comments in blue.]
MATTHEWS: We're back with Anne Kornblut of "The New York Times" and Dana Milbank of "The Washington Post." Let's talk about Gotham's candidates for president.
First, Rudolph Giuliani, the pro-choice, pro-gay rights, former mayor spent today, or the day in Orlando speaking to a conference of Evangelicals.
Dana, he's up to it, isn't he? This is below the radar. This is Rudy campaigning for president in the south.
MILBANK: This is about as convincing as Jerry Falwell at the gay pride parade.
MATTHEWS: You don't buy this?
MILBANK: Well, he can try to do it. But, look, he faces an awful uphill battle in winning over the typical Republican voter in a primary. Now, if the election was fought on national security, he is fine. But he's never going to convince them that he is one of them, that he is a religious conservative.
KORNBLUT: Right and not only that, but he's going to be in a death struggle with John McCain for the exact same constituency.
MATTHEWS: Let me tell you something. I'll say it here a thousand time. Watch Rudolph Giuliani. Watch him. Security is the issue in this country. Whoever is the next president is going to be seen as more on the ball than even this president on security and terrorism. This country is not going sort on terrorism. We are going to get smarter on it is my hunch.
And Rudy is the guy to do it. And he can be an SOB in many ways. But this country may really want an SOB, a really tough cop as the next president. So watch Rudy, I'm saying it.
Now here is Hillary Clinton, that other New Yorker in the subway series. A new Gallup poll just came out. "USA TODAY" Gallup poll, it shows that 16 percent say that they'll definitely vote for Hillary right now, 32 percent say they might vote for her.
But here's the dagger in the back. Fifty-one percent say they would definitely not vote for Hillary Clinton already the campaign hasn't begun.
KORNBLUT: I mean, this is exactly what Democrats are worried about is that already people have made up their minds. I would argue, I guess, that it is awfully early. We all know how early it is to be talking about this.
MATTHEWS: Definitely.
KORNBLUT: Definitely? What does definitely mean? [Definitely means DEFINITELY.] You know, you would have to see how is the question exactly phrased, all that stuff. It is early. [Actually Anne, it is late. In fact, it is too late. The country knows exactly who this woman is, Anne.]
MATTHEWS: But there's lot of tooth behind that. If somebody tells a pollster, I've already made up my mind definitely.
KORNBLUT: And, look, I know more Democrats who believe this though than Republicans. A lot of Republicans say that this is a deceptive number, that once she gets out there with all of her money running against who, Giuliani or McCain, the numbers may not be that weak. [She has 100% name recognition, Anne. You can't make a silk purse from a sow's ear. Even when the sow isn't hillary.]
MATTHEWS: How much of that is don't throw me in that briar patch, Dana? We're so afraid of Hillary. Please don't run her against us. She'll kill us.
MILBANK: Anne is right that these polls are completely useless because you don't know what the alternative is. But the fact is that she... [Earth to Dana: 51% would vote for their mother-in-law before they would vote for HER.]
MATTHEWS: OK. McCain against Hillary. Who wins?
MILBANK: Well, that's fine. If you can tell me that's how it is going to turn out. But we don't know.
MATTHEWS: Well, let me ask you about these definite numbers in a poll. Do you believe the definite? Do you believe somebody right in 2006 knows how they are going to vote in 2008?
MILBANK: I think they definitely think that's what they are going to do right now, but they have no idea what they are going to be doing in a couple years. And Hillary is going to have the opposite problem of Rudy. And that is she's absolutely fine with her base if she decides to run. But she is seemingly incapable of crossing over.
MATTHEWS: The poll was taken over the week right through Sunday, the Gallup poll. And the Gallup poll is, of course, the most prestigious poll there is right now and has been for years.
Dana, do you think she's paying the price for her plantation remark last week?
MILBANK: Probably not. Because, once again, plays very well the base. The people who were objecting to it were never going to support her in the first case. And I really think the only thing that this is right now is do people recognize her name. [What is it you don't understand, here? We recognize her name, yes. And we abhor the person attached to that name. Get it?]
KORNBLUT: And I would add to that. It's 51 percent say definitely not. Remember the margin that's we've been talking about in the last few presidential races, 51 percent is terrible, but all she would have to do is bump it by a few numbers, a few percentage points and be OK. [I can see why Pinch hired you. Your Alice-in-Wonderland illogic is quintessential New York Times. With 100% name recognition and roughly 10% corruption recognition (thanks in no small measure to your rag), missus clinton has only one way to go. And it isn't up.]
... Anyway, thank you Anne Kornblut of "The New York Times," Dana Milbank of "The Washington Post."
Join us again tomorrow night at 5:00 and 7:00 Eastern for more HARDBALL. Right now it is time for "THE ABRAM'S REPORT" with Dan.
THIS IS A RUSH TRANSCRIPT. THIS COPY MAY NOT BE IN ITS FINAL FORM AND MAY BE UPDATED.
Copy: Content and programming copyright 2006 MSNBC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
HARDBALL WITH CHRIS MATTHEWS |
|
|
|
SEE VIDEO: "HILLARY IS 'DOOMED'" (more 'plantation' fallout)
|
COPYRIGHT MIA T 2006
Yep. And that it was Gallup/CNN meant that they could not ignore it. LOL...
See post 36. Also: WHY HILLARY MUST NOT WIN. WHY HILLARY CANNOT WIN.
As for hillary's problem in particular, and a female's in general G. K. Chesterton
While America appears not to be ready for a female president under any circumstances, the post-9/11 realities pose special problems for a female presidential candidate. Add to these the problems unique to missus clinton. The reviews make the mistake of focusing on the problems of the generic female presidential candidate running during ordinary times. These are not ordinary times. America is waging the global War on Terror; the uncharted territory of asymmetric netherworlds is the battlefield; the enemy is brutal, subhuman; the threat of global conflagration is real. Defeating the enemy isn't sufficient. For America to prevail, she must also defeat a retrograde, misogynous mindset. To successfully prosecute the War on Terror, it is essential that the collective patriarchal islamic culture perceives America as politically and militarily strong. Condi Rice excepted, this requirement presents an insurmountable hurdle for any female presidential candidate, and especially missus clinton, historically antimilitary, forever the pitiful victim, and, according to Dick Morris, "the biggest dove in the clinton administration." It is ironic that had the clintons not failed utterly to fight terrorism... not failed to take bin Laden from Sudan... not failed repeatedly to decapitate a nascent, still stoppable al Qaeda... the generic female president as a construct would still be viable... missus clinton's obstacles would be limited largely to standard-issue clintonisms: corruption, abuse, malpractice, malfeasance, megalomania, rape and treason... and, in spite of Juanita Broaddrick, or perhaps because of her, Rod Lurie would be reduced to perversely hawking the "First Gentleman" instead of the "Commander-in-Chief." Mia T, 10.02.05
THE PROBLEM
HILLARY'S COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF PROBLEM
COMPLETE ARTICLE
see descriptor morphs
Mia T, 11.23.05
REINVENTING HILLARY... AGAIN
(clinton machine dumps Geena Davis for Margaret Thatcher)
how the clintons are handling the hillary dud factor2
"Gallup is no rightwing tool. Someone up there on the Left want to rid the party of miss hillary, methinks."
Well said! I totally agree, and they are coming out early to attempt to get her to not run, IMO.
bump
see 36
HILLARY.....FINALLY A MAN THE DEMOCACTS CAN SUPPORT
If she can't win fairly, she'll need to prepare to win by dirty means. Hillary surely considers this good information because it allows her plenty of time to prepare.
Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr Ironically, the logic of this pronouncement by Martin Luther King would, in short order, be refuted by the reality of his own lynching. King's hope was misplaced and his reasoning was circular. The resultant rule of law relied on by King presumed an adherence to the rule of law in the first instance. Adherence to the rule of law is not something normally associated with the clintons. Moreover, racial and ethnic disrespect, intimidation, exploitation and hate have always been a fundamental clinton tactic and the reflexive use the "N"-word and other racial and ethnic slurs, an essential element in the clinton lexicon. When the "first black president" and his wife ran Arkansas, the NAACP sued them for intimidating black voters at the polls. The Curious Candidacy of Carol Moseley Braun: Mia T, 01.18.06 Mia T, 07.23.05
THE FIRST BLACK PRESIDENT?
clinton legacy of lynching update
by Mia T, 7.23.05
an Extension of clinton drag and drop and legacy of lynching
by Mia T, 2.20.03
GONE WITH THE WIND
(miss hillary's 'plantation' blunder)
THE FIRST BLACK PRESIDENT?
clinton legacy of lynching update
Full transcript. Video excerpt: RealPlayer or Windows Media. Plus MP3
Warner
George Allen would hand Warner his hat and show him the door.
Watched Warner on C-SPAN. Seemed likable, reasonable and competent... (as opposed to missus clinton)....
He struck me as a potentially tough opponent.
;)
Even more depressing for hillary, that poll was of generic Americans, not even registered likelys. It's probably stilted 5% more against her with that group.
<< MILBANK: Well, he can try to do it. But, look, he faces an awful uphill battle in winning over the typical Republican voter in a primary. Now, if the election was fought on national security, he is fine. But he's never going to convince them that he is one of them, that he is a religious conservative.
KORNBLUT: Right and not only that, but he's going to be in a death struggle with John McCain for the exact same constituency. >>
Absolute Certainty Number One: Although each has a better chance of being a factor in the 2008 election than does Mrs Rotten-Blythe, neither Mr Rudy "East-of-the-Hudson" Giuliani nor Mr John "Once-Flew-Over-the-Cukoo's-Nest -- and Came Back!" McCain will be the Republican Party's 2008 presidential candidate. Nor will either be his running mate.
Absolute Certainty Number Two: In 1990 57% of actual voters absolutely would not and actually did not vote for the front-man for [Codpiece of?] the crime family that, as the consequence of that year's presidential election and for the following eight awful years -- and despite that two hundred and twenty million of those of us then alive have NEVER voted for ANY Cli'ton -- besquatted and bemanured our once most-hallowed house and converted and effectively owned, operated, controlled, looted, subverted and sold-out the administrative branch of our government.
Might not our task then be to see to it - and despite that their organization's ever-accelerating death spiral has every one of them by-the-minute ever more flustered and morbidly-incoherent - that the "Democrats" themselves reject Mrs Cli'ton's candidacy?
And instead follow their own 2004 example and select another more electorally-viable candidate?
Blessings - Brian
BUMP
And Never Came Back!
Bill Clinton was the most skillful political candidate in 1992. Frankly, the most skillful candidate of the 90's. Hillary flatly does not have the capacity to fire people up. You can't get fired up over someone who triangulates everything. "All the Kings's Men" was on cable yesterday morning. Remember the scene where Willie Stark ditches his canned speech and corrupt handlers on the stump and shows his 'hicks' that he 'shares their pain' ? Can you imagine Hillary connecting with people like that ? Bill could. He could fit in at Oxford and at a Black Baptist church. Hillary doesn't have that.
Between Feingold firing up the left and Warner getting the right it remains to be seen whether Hillary will retain the monolithic Black support she desparately needs to even be nominated.
Bill's going to have another affair publicized so she can get the sympathy vote. ;)
(In the meantime ..she needs a full time speech coach. When she rants , my cats hide.)
Horsefeathers.
A jilted woman is a victim. A victim is not commander in chief material.
Tell that to the deluded women who adore her.
|
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.