Fmr. Saddam General, Georges Sada, on WMDs (VIDEO)

Ms, Underestimated ^ | January 25, 2006

[Kaslin]

FOX NEWS EXCLUSIVE

I doubt very much that I will see this anytime soon on the MSM outlets, but H&C had the EXCLUSIVE tonight with former Saddam General, Georges Sada, who is the author of the new book, "Saddam's Secrets."

View the video here

[jeltz25]

Is he at all like "Saddam's Bombmaker" Khidir Hamza who was on all the tv shows before the war saying Saddam had everything under the sun?

I wonder whatever happened to Hamza, he seems to have disappeared since the war.

[ozzymandus]

I noticed that the lying RAT beckel had very little to say about this. If I was Hannity I would have beaten him over the head with this info.

[goodnesswins]

YEAH, the OLD media is mysteriously quiet on this, aren't they.....WMD's.....THIS GUY says the WMD's went to SYRIA.....you'd think it would be on every newscast. But, it just isn't the RIGHT news for them.

[Kaslin]

He couldn't say anything because he was stunned

[oolatec]

Well, Sada does have a book out now... ;)

[Kaslin]

Naturally they have stuck their heads in the sand and are ignoring this

[Anti-Bubba182]

I saw the show and I don't think he is as dubious as the others.

There is no doubt about the massive truck traffic to Syria before the war and in this program he described how there were 49 sorties of cargo 747s to Damascus with WMDs. Sada denied that Iraq had any Nuke program but they did have chemical weapons.

General Georges Sada

[sangrila]

"There is no doubt about the massive truck traffic to Syria before the war and in this program he described how there were 49 sorties of cargo 747s to Damascus with WMDs. Sada denied that Iraq had any Nuke program but they did have chemical weapons."

There is a good chance the weapons went to Syria, and will possibly end up in Israel if and when Iran is hit by the West or Israel. Iran's wacko president was just in Syria. The Syrian government knows they are all but finished if Iran falls, so they may go out in the blaze of glory with Iran, trying to take Israel out in the process with tons of chemical and biological weapons.

[jwalsh07]

Sada denied that Iraq had any Nuke program but they did have chemical weapons.

Interesting. So Habalja wasn't mass hysteria after all. I'll be danged!

[bray]

So Bush was right and the left is Lying about Lying!! The sad part is that the Dims already know this from classified briefings but lie for political gain.

Pray for W and Our Freedom Fighters

[hipaatwo]

Watch this video, wait until you see the last few minutes.

[Graymatter]

I wonder how this will play into the SOTU speech. :)
(Next sound you hear may be Dem heads...exploding.)

[dc-zoo]

Bump for later

[Names Ash Housewares]

OK.

So if he is right.........

DID IRAN GET NUKES FROM SYRIA?

and that is why Iran is acting the way it is?

[jeltz25]

Perhaps not, but I do remember that Hamza was all over FoxNews and tons of conservatives and supportters of the war were trumpeting his first hand knowledge and experience as proof that Saddam had WMDs and Nukes.

Now, it appears that was, to quote Bush and David Kay "all wrong".

If however, he's telling the truth and Saddam was able to send massive cargo truck shipments and 50 747's to Damascus in the build up of the war and we did nothing to stop it and the WH or Pentagon hasn't even mentioned it, then we're in worse shape than I thought. I mean, for all we knew, there could have been nukes, anthrax, ricin, vx, etc.. in those trucks or planes and we didn't lift a finger to stop them. Who knows what happened to them once they touched down in Damascus. They're probably in Baalbek in the Bekka or deep in the Zagros Mountains by now. If that happened that was unacceptable negligence on the part of the administration.

If our billions in SAT and SIGINT couldn't pick up any of that, then we should just abolish DIA, CIA, NSA, and NRO-they're useless.

If this is true, what is the explanation for the complete and total US inactivity on this matter? I have to believe he's lying because if this were even remotely true, the WH would have brought it up to defend their statements on WMD. As it stands, the WH has pretty much openly admitted that they were wrong about WMD and that Saddam never really had anything.


I'd just be a bit more skeptical before we use this guy's book to invade Syria or Iran.

[CGVet58]

you'll both recall the thwarted terror strike against Jordan which came from across the Syrian border - a combination of blister and nerve agents that was designed to blow up near the government center/US Embassy in Amman, and which - if successful - would have likely caused 80,000 casualties?

Besides the salient fact that our media ignored this story for almost ten days, the key items about this attempt were that the perps were tied with AQ, had had talks with former Iraqi personnel who were now operating out of Syria, and were using chemical/bio weps which Syria had not previously been known/thought to have stockpiled.

As this WSJ: Al Qaeda's Poison Gas article shows, our leftists, media, Colmes-skullheads of the world will only admit to WMD the moment they either (A) find a Dr. Strangelove-ianesque stockpile of ICBM's next to one of Saddam's palaces, thousands and thousands of missiles that are parked in the desert and are visible for as far as the eye can see, all with that little moon and star thing from islamic flags on their warhead cones... or (B) see a WMD used against the US.

These people are sick, they are the traitors within, and I sincerely hope they don't stop spewing their filth!!! Every common-sense American needs to be continually reminded that these vermin cannot be trusted with the security of our Nation.

[jeltz25]

All I'm saying is that this guy should be checked out much more throurougly than Hamza was and I'd be skeptical before I oredered any further military action based on info from former members of Saddam's regime.

And if we did let all this WMD get out than the Iraq war was a failure in an important respect. We have an air force, we had control of Iraqi airspace. What are we doing letting 50 747s make their way to Damascus. Did Iraq even have that many planes. They had virtually no air force and whatever they did have was Russian so I highly doubt this guy is on the up and up. Saddam didn't have 50 Boeings. If he had said 50 Ilyushins or 50 Antonovs than maybe I'd believe him. Where were the boys in blue while all these flights of WMD were taking palce? Twiddling their thumbs? This would have been a turkey shhot and it would have been easy to force them to land or take them out.

What good was takng out Saddam and putting up a democracy if he just gave all his WMDs to Hezbollah, AQ, Syria, Iran or whatver other Jihadist killers may have gotten their hands on it in the past 3 yrs?

This guy could check out, but 1 interview on Hannity and Colmes does not an unimpeachable source make.

[sangrila]

The media is too busy talking about the NSA non-scandal and the Alito hearings. Their priorities are seriously warped since we hear nothing about the instances you cited or the current situations in Iran and the middle east. The media is not reporting the dangerous situations that could lead to world war.

Iran's crazy president met with Syria's leaders; Iran probably already has the bomb; Hamas is closely linked to Iran and Syria and is now possibly the ruling party of Palestine; Russia and China will very possibly side with Iran in this situation; Pakistan and India are two nuclear powers and nobody really know what they are going to do in this situation; we are fighting two wars in emerging democracies in that region. And the media is concerned because our government is spying on people they should be spying on. The media a-holes need to do their jobs and to get of Bush's back about crap that isn't important.

[texianyankee]

bump for later