Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Saddam's Trial Features 'Minimal' U.S. Involvement
American Forces Press Service ^ | Jan 25, 2006 | Gerry Gilmore

Posted on 01/25/2006 6:10:02 PM PST by SandRat

WASHINGTON, Jan. 25, 2006 – U.S. involvement with Saddam Hussein's sometimes noisy, protracted trial in Baghdad "is minimal," a senior Defense Department spokesman said here today. "The court proceedings are all Iraqi-government run (and) handled," Bryan Whitman told reporters at the Pentagon, noting that the U.S. military is involved with some aspects of Saddam's detention.

Saddam and seven of his former aides are being tried for crimes against humanity for allegedly being involved in the killing of about 150 people in the village of Dujail, Iraq, in July 1982. Coalition and U.S. forces deposed the then-dictator in April 2003. U.S. troops captured him -- dirty, disheveled and hiding in a hole -- in December of that year.

Saddam's trial began Oct. 19, 2005, but it has been postponed a number of times due to the killing of two defense lawyers, the flight of another, and procedural arguments. Saddam has repeatedly denounced the legal proceedings against him. The former dictator has been responsible for several loud courtroom outbursts and disruptions

"I'm not going to try to characterize the trial or comment on some of the more theatrical aspects of it," Whitman said, noting that Saddam deserves a fair trial for his alleged crimes.

The Iraqi magistrate presiding over Saddam's trial, Judge Rizgar Mohammed Amin, quit his post Jan. 9, citing personal reasons, according to news reports. Then Amin's replacement, Judge Said Hammashi, the most senior among the remaining magistrates hearing Saddam's trial, was removed Jan. 23 because he was accused of once being a Baath Party member.

Yesterday, an absence of witnesses caused Saddam's trial to be postponed yet again, with Jan. 29 as the slated restart date, according to news reports.

"I think the general sentiment across the world is that Saddam Hussein should be held to account for his actions, and that's being done," Whitman said. "As we know, sometimes legal processes take some time."


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: features; involvement; iraq; minimal; saddams; trial; us

1 posted on 01/25/2006 6:10:05 PM PST by SandRat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2LT Radix jr; 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub; 80 Square Miles; AlaninSA; A Ruckus of Dogs; acad1228; ...

PING


2 posted on 01/25/2006 6:10:25 PM PST by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

There are going to be bumps along the road to Saddam's eventual end, but they'll get there, and the Iraqis will be better off in the long run for having gone through the judicial process, rather than just taking the b*stard out and shooting him.


3 posted on 01/25/2006 6:50:25 PM PST by hsalaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

BTTT


4 posted on 01/26/2006 3:04:28 AM PST by E.G.C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson