I'd be curious to know how much the 'morning after' pill has influenced these numbers, and a breakdown of how many consider RU-486 to be an abortion in the same moral sense as the clinical procedure.
I would think everyone would consider RU-486 to be the equivalent of a surgical abortion, since it can be done eight weeks into pregnancy. What I simply can't understand is why some people consider the morning-after pill, a higher concentration of the regular birth control pill, to be as morally objectionable as abortion, when it prevents the need for abortion.
And what I REALLY can't understand is people who have strong opinions about the morning after pill and RU-486, but use the terms interchangeably because they can't tell the difference between the two.