To: dead
Amazing the body could have survived in water intact for that length of time.
6 posted on
01/25/2006 9:08:27 AM PST by
Brett66
(Where government advances – and it advances relentlessly – freedom is imperiled -Janice Rogers Brown)
To: Brett66
Amazing the body could have survived in water intact for that length of time. Actually, it didn't survive that long. It was dead all that time. Arrrg! :)
8 posted on
01/25/2006 9:09:46 AM PST by
theDentist
(Qwerty ergo typo : I type, therefore I misspelll.)
To: Brett66
Maybe it was frozen in a glacier or sumthin.
10 posted on
01/25/2006 9:10:31 AM PST by
najida
(Purgeing the world of literacy, one typo at a time.)
To: Brett66
I've seen pictures, it was really more in the sand.
I would think that would be a pretty good preserver of bones.
And in fairness to the cops, I would think Carbon-14 dating is not in the standard test kit.
14 posted on
01/25/2006 9:13:20 AM PST by
MeanWestTexan
(Many at FR would respond to Christ "Darn right, I'll cast the first stone!")
To: Brett66
Amazing the body could have survived in water intact for that length of time. Not everyone trusts radiocarbon dating methods. To be under the water, just below the tideline, for 500 years, and to look "good as new" seems a little hard to believe.
To: Brett66
Maybe the body just got loose from a peat bog or deep mud where it has been kept preserved. Good grief. At this rate perhaps someday a dino will wash up in South Beach.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson