Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/25/2006 7:10:53 AM PST by ShadowAce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: rdb3; chance33_98; Calvinist_Dark_Lord; Bush2000; PenguinWry; GodGunsandGuts; CyberCowboy777; ...

2 posted on 01/25/2006 7:11:13 AM PST by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ShadowAce

Welsome to Europe! We punish success!


3 posted on 01/25/2006 7:14:57 AM PST by agere_contra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ShadowAce
The source code provides the building blocks of the operating system that competitors need to make products compatible with Windows.

WTF?

A graduate of the UK school of blather, I suppose.

If you "make products compatible with Windows", that doesn't make you a "competitor".

People have been making "products compatible with Windows" for a long time without access to the source code for Windows.

6 posted on 01/25/2006 7:25:54 AM PST by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ShadowAce

I can't even begin to imagine how difficult it will be to deal with Microsoft's code for Windows. The sheer volume will be almost impossible to deal with. Further, by this time, the code will be so full of kludges and inactive code that it's going to cause enormous confusion in anyone who tries to decipher it.

I went back a while ago and looked at the source code for one of my old Windows apps, thinking I might get back into the business and update the application. I wrote this thing myself, with no other programmers involved. It's been 10 years since I finished the last version.

After several hours of study, I decided that I'm definitely done with coding. At one time, I could go back into the code and work with it, but I knew it then like the back of my hand, and could keep virtually all of the variables and routines in my grasp.

Windows, since the first version, contains so much code, written by so many people and teams, that it's going to be impossible to comprehend. Microsoft isn't all that terrific about transparency in its code, and I've worked with some Microsoft-originated stuff. Further, their need to maintain backwards compatibility (all the Win 3.1 apps I wrote back in the 90s still run perfectly in XP) means that there is lots of old crap in the current versions.

Good luck!


8 posted on 01/25/2006 7:30:18 AM PST by MineralMan (godless atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ShadowAce

Since when is this about releasing code? I thought MS was only supposed to release full API specs to allow for compatibility. Forcing them to release code sounds quite anti-capitalist.


11 posted on 01/25/2006 7:39:49 AM PST by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ShadowAce

In other news, the courts ordered Ford to turn over all schematics and blueprints to GM and Daimler-Chrysler in order to ensure all cars can drive on the same road.


14 posted on 01/25/2006 7:54:31 AM PST by Lunatic Fringe (North Texas Solutions http://ntxsolutions.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ShadowAce; N3WBI3; antiRepublicrat

You boys should be jumping for joy, this is how you've claimed your freeware clones were so superior - because the code was open. Now that Microsoft is opening theirs more you're whining? Ha, obviously because you know your beloved clones are about to be seriously marginalized.

As for me, I'm against it, secrecy is an additional layer of security, and without the EU and other socialists pushing open source on us all this never would have happened.


37 posted on 01/25/2006 8:56:04 PM PST by Golden Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ShadowAce

Good move by our European brothers and sisters.


48 posted on 01/25/2006 10:08:17 PM PST by TheBrotherhood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ShadowAce
The release of the Windows source code would boost Linux. You could write linmodem drivers and the WINE project would no longer have to guess at how Windows applications should run on Linux. Microsoft should look at going open-source as a blessing in disguise. Apple's flagship Mac OSX is already compatible with Linux applications.

(Denny Crane: "I Don't Want To Socialize With A Pinko Liberal Democrat Commie. Say What You Like About Republicans. We Stick To Our Convictions. Even When We Know We're Dead Wrong.")

60 posted on 01/26/2006 6:36:35 AM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson