Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iraq - Saddam trial postponed after judge searched: lawyer
Agence France Presse | January 24, 2006

Posted on 01/24/2006 6:59:12 PM PST by HAL9000

The trial of ousted Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein was postponed after the newly-appointed chief judge objected to being searched, a defence lawyer said Tuesday.

"What happened was when the new judge came to the court he was searched vigorously by the Americans, which he did not like," said Najib al-Nuami, who represents Saddam.

Rauf Rashid Abdel Rahman "complained about it, saying why should he be searched," according to Nuami.

Another defence lawyer, who declined to be named, said he too heard the hearing was postponed because Abdel Rahman "was unhappy with security procedures, including searches".

The court put off the hearing, which would have been the eighth since the trial began three months ago, because some witnesses were unable to attend, according to investigating judge Raed al-Juhi.

"Due to the fact some of the complainants could not make it to attend the court, some of them are out of Iraq and some are on pilgrimage, the court decided to postpone the session until Sunday," he told reporters, reading from a court statement.

He declined to take questions.

Security measures are very strict with lawyers, witnesses and journalists carefully vetted and searched at the court.

Rahman, a previously unknown Kurdish magistrate was appointed at the last minute on Monday to preside over the trial after the previous chief judge Rizkar Mohammed Amin quit following criticism that he was too lenient with the defendants.

Nuami said there also appeared to be pressure on Abdel Rahman from the present government.

"There is tremendous government pressure on him from the very first day, which was also the case with the previous judges, which is why they quit," Nuami told AFP.

"The pressure is to speed up the trial, not to give us a chance to give a good defense, and shut up our clients," he said.

The trial of Saddam and seven other co-defendants was postponed until Sunday.

Saddam and the other defendants face charges including murder and torture over the massacre of more than 140 Shiites following an attempt on the life of the ousted dictator in 1982 in the village of Dujail.

If found guilty, they could be hanged.



TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: baghdad; dujail; iraq; saddam; saddamhussein; saddamtrail

1 posted on 01/24/2006 6:59:14 PM PST by HAL9000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
"he was searched vigorously by the Americans, which he did not like"

I imagine it could only have been worse had he liked it.

2 posted on 01/24/2006 7:14:27 PM PST by billorites (freepo ergo sum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000

What a damn baby...


3 posted on 01/24/2006 7:54:29 PM PST by FreedomNeocon (I'm in no Al-Samood for this Shi'ite.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000

Mark my words, Saddam is going to walk. The Iraqis don't have the cojones to do what needs to be done.


4 posted on 01/24/2006 7:57:54 PM PST by stboz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billorites
I imagine it could only have been worse had he liked it.

LOL. That would be an attention getter.

"he was searched vigorously by the Americans, which he liked"

5 posted on 01/25/2006 1:52:33 AM PST by Mind-numbed Robot (Not all that needs to be done needs to be done by the government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: stboz
Mark my words, Saddam is going to walk.

We should have stuffed a grenade into Saddam's spider hole, and called it a day. Then we should have force fed them their new constitution, like MacArthur did to the Japanese. We put way too much onto the shoulders of the Iraqis, and they weren't ready for it. Now Saddam's trial is O.J.esqe comedy, and Iraq's halfway to becoming Iran Lite.

6 posted on 01/25/2006 2:01:39 AM PST by Steel Wolf (If the Founders had wanted the President to be spying on our phone calls, they would have said so!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: stboz

sound like our guards were afraid this judge might have had the cojones to do it and end this stuff right away. I don't think sodomite is going to get out of this alive.


7 posted on 01/25/2006 2:05:40 AM PST by FreeAtlanta (never surrender, this is for the kids)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: stboz
Mark my words, Saddam is going to walk. The Iraqis don't have the cojones to do what needs to be done.

He's not going to walk as long as coalition forces are on the ground.

And the U.S. will have a presence in Iraq into the unforeseeable future.

And I'm not even going to start about the probable reaction of the Iraqi people if Saddam isn't dealt with properly.

Don't believe the B.S. the media feeds people about Iraqi sentiment concerning Saddam. The majority of the Iraqis are fiercely opposed to Saddam and won't stand for an unsatisfactory end to this.

We just need to be a little patient. This is new to them and they're in an adjustment phase.

8 posted on 01/25/2006 2:10:10 AM PST by Allegra (Stamp Out Jet Lag. Abolish Time Zones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
I've quit posting on these threads, but let me say one more time:

This "trial" of Saddam is a sorry farce which shoild be terminated before it does any more harm.

Saddam's major crime (from a US perspective) was tugging on Superman's cape. IF we were to be the agents of infinite justice, he should have been shot on sight.

IF people who live in the former Ottoman vilayets of Mosul, Mesopotamia, and Basra (known in the media as "Iraqis") were to be the agents of infinite justice, he should have been turned over to the Kurds or Sistani two years ago.

The only possible bad outcome resulting from Saddam's prolonged and inexplicable survival after his capture would be his return to power. His best chance will come after the collapse of his show trial (now in progress) and the upcoming attack on Iran.

We should have killed him when we had the chance.

9 posted on 01/25/2006 2:19:53 AM PST by Jim Noble (And you know what I'm talkin' 'bout)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson