Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What Is the Free Market?
Ludwig von Mises Institute ^ | today | Murray N. Rothbard

Posted on 01/24/2006 11:31:04 AM PST by Marxbites

The Free market is a summary term for an array of exchanges that take place in society. Each exchange is undertaken as a voluntary agreement between two people or between groups of people represented by agents. These two individuals (or agents) exchange two economic goods, either tangible commodities or nontangible services. Thus, when I buy a newspaper from a news dealer for fifty cents, the news dealer and I exchange two commodities: I give up fifty cents, and the news dealer gives up the newspaper. Or if I work for a corporation, I exchange my labor services, in a mutually agreed way, for a monetary salary; here the corporation is represented by a manager (an agent) with the authority to hire.

Both parties undertake the exchange because each expects to gain from it. Also, each will repeat the exchange next time (or refuse to) because his expectation has proved correct (or incorrect) in the recent past. Trade, or exchange, is engaged in precisely because both parties benefit; if they did not expect to gain, they would not agree to the exchange.

This simple reasoning refutes the argument against free trade typical of the "mercantilist" period of sixteenth- to eighteenth-century Europe, and classically expounded by the famed sixteenth-century French essayist Montaigne. The mercantilists argued that in any trade, one party can benefit only at the expense of the other, that in every transaction there is a winner and a loser, an "exploiter" and an "exploited." We can immediately see the fallacy in this still-popular viewpoint: the willingness and even eagerness to trade means that both parties benefit. In modern game-theory jargon, trade is a win-win situation, a "positive-sum" rather than a "zero-sum" or "negative-sum" game............

(Excerpt) Read more at mises.org ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: freemarket; rothbard; vonmises
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-59 next last
This was the Founders vision for America
1 posted on 01/24/2006 11:31:05 AM PST by Marxbites
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Marxbites

A free market is 99 cents cheaper than the 99 cent store.


2 posted on 01/24/2006 11:37:33 AM PST by billybudd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Marxbites
This was the Founders vision for America

Not exactly. The "Federalist" Founders wanted a mercantilist economy. The "Anti-Federalist" Founders were the advocates of a free market.

I think you'll find that what we have now adheres to the specifications of the Federalists.

3 posted on 01/24/2006 11:55:09 AM PST by yatros from flatwater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Marxbites

A market can be free only if it is fair and that means regulated.


4 posted on 01/24/2006 11:57:49 AM PST by RightWhale (pas de lieu, Rhone que nous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
A market can be free only if it is fair and that means regulated.

Yes, only government, that great arbiter of equity, can make markets free and fair by regulating them. ROFL!!!

5 posted on 01/24/2006 12:36:19 PM PST by Mase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Marxbites
Trade, or exchange, is engaged in precisely because both parties benefit; if they did not expect to gain, they would not agree to the exchange.

Watch it . . . that kind of thinking can get one labeled as a globalist, or socialist, or some such nonsense.

6 posted on 01/24/2006 12:39:01 PM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mase

The market must be regulated, but if that must mean gov't regulation, then is to be expected to find scoffers. There is something else besides gov't, always has been.


7 posted on 01/24/2006 12:39:09 PM PST by RightWhale (pas de lieu, Rhone que nous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Marxbites

The answer to the question posed in the title is "A myth."


8 posted on 01/24/2006 12:41:05 PM PST by lugsoul ("Try not to be sad." - Laura Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mase

Thanks - and no wonder America is so screwed up!

It's full of ignorant statists!!!


9 posted on 01/24/2006 12:52:05 PM PST by Marxbites (Freedom is the negation of Govt to the maximum extent possible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: yatros from flatwater

What garbage we get here.

Federalists schmederalists.

Freedom means we own our own bodies and whatever we produce, ergo property rights are natural rights.

The ONLY reason for Govt to exist is to protect our rights and to compel men to do what they voluntarily will not do, ergo the rule of law to protect our rights and contracts etc, and to have justice for those that harm others, PERIOD!!!

Free people voluntarily exchange goods and services IF they want to.

Only complete idiots think regulation is a positive or necessary thing.


10 posted on 01/24/2006 12:52:15 PM PST by Marxbites (Freedom is the negation of Govt to the maximum extent possible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: lugsoul; Toddsterpatriot

Unintentionally hilarious. I'll wager that you are a veritable laugh riot at the grocery store.


11 posted on 01/24/2006 12:53:38 PM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: lugsoul

Au contraire.

Even before coins existed men bartered freely if it was deemed by each to be beneficial.

Got yer degree at Sears did ya?

Next we'll hear that "fair trade" a la the unions, is free trade - when it's just unions protecting themselves from competition at our expenses. Like the tariffs/subsidies making sugar cost Americans twice as much as offshore. The very reason candy companies have relocated OUT of the US.

Back to econ 101 for the dunces.


12 posted on 01/24/2006 1:00:01 PM PST by Marxbites (Freedom is the negation of Govt to the maximum extent possible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Marxbites

Oh, so you (the non-dunce) believe we have "free trade." Tell me, oh econ guru, which market or markets are not affected by artificial restraints on trade imposed by regulation?


13 posted on 01/24/2006 1:09:16 PM PST by lugsoul ("Try not to be sad." - Laura Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: lugsoul

The black market, for starters.


14 posted on 01/24/2006 1:11:03 PM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
Ah, so the risk premium doesn't skew the market?

Enjoy your stay in fantasyland.

15 posted on 01/24/2006 1:14:28 PM PST by lugsoul ("Try not to be sad." - Laura Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: lugsoul

Ok, try this one: I paint your garage in exchange for you mowing my lawn.


16 posted on 01/24/2006 1:16:01 PM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: lugsoul
And one more thing. A "risk premium" is not an "artificial restraint on trade imposed by regulation."
17 posted on 01/24/2006 1:22:05 PM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
I get one hell of a deal.

And you have to deal with various laws regarding the disposal of paint.

And, where I live, I am required by law to purchase specific yard waste bags to dispose of the clippings and such.

18 posted on 01/24/2006 1:22:54 PM PST by lugsoul ("Try not to be sad." - Laura Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

It is if the risk is created by breach or avoidance of the law or regulation.


19 posted on 01/24/2006 1:23:32 PM PST by lugsoul ("Try not to be sad." - Laura Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: lugsoul
Man, you are the absolute king of assuming facts not in evidence. Try this one, and hope your head doesn't explode. You scratch my back, I tie your shoe.
20 posted on 01/24/2006 1:32:07 PM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-59 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson