Posted on 01/24/2006 6:44:17 AM PST by conservativecorner
President Bush gave a terrific speech at Kansas State yesterday. For one thing, he was very funny. His visibly high spirits suggest to me that he thinks events are moving his way. You can read the speech in its entirety, along with an entertaining question and answer session, here. This is what the President said about the NSA international surveillance program:
I made the decision to do the following things because there's an enemy that still wants to harm the American people. What I'm talking about is the intercept of certain communications emanating between somebody inside the United States and outside the United States; and one of the numbers would be reasonably suspected to be an al Qaeda link or affiliate. In other words, we have ways to determine whether or not someone can be an al Qaeda affiliate or al Qaeda. And if they're making a phone call in the United States, it seems like to me we want to know why. This is a -- I repeat to you, even though you hear words, "domestic spying," these are not phone calls within the United States. It's a phone call of an al Qaeda, known al Qaeda suspect, making a phone call into the United States. I'm mindful of your civil liberties, and so I had all kinds of lawyers review the process. We briefed members of the United States Congress, one of whom was Senator Pat Roberts, about this program. You know, it's amazing, when people say to me, well, he was just breaking the law -- if I wanted to break the law, why was I briefing Congress? (Laughter and applause.)
Hmm, good point. Bush continued:
Federal courts have consistently ruled that a President has authority under the Constitution to conduct foreign intelligence surveillance against our enemies. Predecessors of mine have used that same constitutional authority. As I keep saying, the President's constitutional power is the key point.
Recently there was a Supreme Court case called the Hamdi case. It ruled the authorization for the use of military force passed by the Congress in 2001 -- in other words, Congress passed this piece of legislation. And the Court ruled, the Supreme Court ruled that it gave the President additional authority to use what it called "the fundamental incidents of waging war" against al Qaeda. I'm not a lawyer, but I can tell you what it means. It means Congress gave me the authority to use necessary force to protect the American people, but it didn't prescribe the tactics. It's an -- you've got the power to protect us, but we're not going to tell you how. And one of the ways to protect the American people is to understand the intentions of the enemy. I told you it's a different kind of war with a different kind of enemy. If they're making phone calls into the United States, we need to know why -- to protect you. (Applause.)
I caught this part of the speech on CNN over the lunch hour yesterday. CNN had a banner across the bottom of the screen that would summarize what the President was saying. CNN played it straight, except when President Bush was talking about the international surveiillance program. Then, the CNN banner contained a running rebuttal to the President.
President Bush is a great warrior for freedom.
Funny how the only thing you keep hearing about this speech in the press is about that stupid question about the barebacking movie.
. . . yet McCain-Feingold, which presumes to control your speech and printing, exempts CNN. You see, the money CNN gets from advertisers is pure as the driven snow. While your money is dirty, inherently tainted. </sarcasm>
Yep there's no media bias there.
CNN should just get some nads, and come out and say they hate the president and administration...we all know they do anyway. Probably, really urked the CNN moes when they found out Bush wasnt going to go see BROKEBACK.
CNN does more to damage this country in a day, then Al-Qaida could dream of doing in a year.
You had to see it to appreciate just how wonderful it was!!!
>>We briefed members of the United States Congress, one of whom was Senator Pat Roberts, about this program. You know, it's amazing, when people say to me, well, he was just breaking the law -- if I wanted to break the law, why was I briefing Congress? (Laughter and applause.)<<
He ought to publish the dates of every briefing and the names of all who attended. We can then compare that list with who is complaining about the program in public. So can the press, if they really care.
Well he did also make his standard pitch for his guestworker shamnesty. He has YET to explain how he is going to make the guests go home when their visas expire. It is pretty obvious that dispite his disingenuous denials about it not being an amnesty, he has not intent that they will ever go home.
I just spent 1:52 watching the video stream of this (that I linked-to from here) and now I can't find it. Can anyone help?
I was unable to see it yesterday and hoped they would rerun it on Cspan. I guess not. I had read all about it here.
I am so disgusted with the media. I know the President did great yesterday, so naturally the media hasn't mentioned it at all. Only the Brokeback comment. I found it completely disrespectful, I mean the question.
Reminding me of the 'set up' armored humvee question that was thrown at Rumsfeld during a press conference in Kuwait.
Yes, I'm sure you are correct. It's just so disrespectful.
Those vultures need to be reminded by the President that rudeness is not going to be tolerated.
When they disrespect McClellan they disrespect the presidency.
Kansas was hudge .... a BIG day for W
.... a BIG win for W.
One of the most televised / reported by MSM of the Presidents puplic engagements.........
because they thought he 'screwed up' with the response to the "Broke Back Mountain" question.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.