To: Stoat
Although I appreciate you sentiments, the reasons we went to war against the Nazi onslaught had very little to do with specifically, liberating France. That was just one of the positive consequences.
10 posted on
01/24/2006 2:03:36 AM PST by
Banjoguy
(I will rot in Hell before I buy another Dell!)
To: Banjoguy
liberating France. That was just one of the positive consequences. Come again?
12 posted on
01/24/2006 2:06:42 AM PST by
leadhead
(It’s a duty and a responsibility to defeat them. But it's also a pleasure)
To: Banjoguy
A minor correction:
That was just one of the positive consequences.
There, that's better.
13 posted on
01/24/2006 2:07:37 AM PST by
FreedomPoster
(Guns themselves are fairly robust; their chief enemies are rust and politicians) (NRA)
To: Banjoguy
Although I appreciate you sentiments, the reasons we went to war against the Nazi onslaught had very little to do with specifically, liberating France. That was just one of the positive consequences.It was never my intent to imply such a thing. I merely said:
I'm wondering if the French would now have preferred that we hadn't rid them and the rest of the world of the threat of Nazism?
This question refers to the effect, not the cause of our involvement.
15 posted on
01/24/2006 2:18:30 AM PST by
Stoat
(Rice / Coulter 2008: Smart Ladies for a Strong America)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson