DC March For Life Pics (Vanity)

January, 24, 2005

[redhead]

Thanks for the lovely pictures. Bless you!

[franky]

Great pictures. We had good representation from Pennsylvania and in particular, the Harrisburg Diocese with Bishop Rhoades leading the way. Our parish had 100 go on Sunday and come back last night.

The elderly in our group, including me, met last night for prayer.

We understand it may have been the largest crowd to ever march. 25,000 were reported at the Mass. and about 100,000 marched.

I compare crowds to sports attendance and knowing that Giants Stadium holds 70,000, there were more in line marching from 1:15 to 3 PM than attends the football games.

It was not the length of the march but the width of the march. I counted (via EWTN) about 30 to 50 people wide, shoulder to shoulder.

[Clump]

Great pics! What a contrast from all the radical left wing vermin that show up on the other side with their NARAL signs.

[CyberAnt]

This is a stunning group of people - what a great turnout!! Congrats to whoever organized it.

[stevio]

Thanks for the update.

[franky]

Let us pray for the San Francisco March for Life this coming week

[linda_22003]

Could well be. There ya go. :)

[Courdeleon02]

Compare the people in this crowd with the pro-choicers and their parades of perverts and creeps. There is your answer. So many on the pro-abortion side actually look like demons from hell.You get a sense of the selfishness and evil that surrounds their cause just by looking at them whereas these people in these photos appear to be like angels from heaven.

[Courdeleon02]

Compare the people in this crowd with the pro-choicers and their parades of perverts and creeps. There is your answer. So many on the pro-abortion side actually look like demons from hell.You get a sense of the selfishness and evil that surrounds their cause just by looking at them whereas these people in these photos appear to be like angels from heaven.

[wardaddy]

Which state of the union does he think will outright outlaw first trimester abortions? Does that state have many abortions anyway? Frankly, I don't think any state will do it.

You are quite wrong.....Mississippi, Utah, West Virginia, Alabama, South Dakota, South Carolina and maybe even Pennsylvania. ..just for starters....look where it was illegal prior to 73. Turning back Roe would be an enormous victory......

[HitmanLV]

Not a chance. The legislatures will chicken out when it comes to first trimester abortion, which is most abortions.

[dixiechick2000]

"...but as a practical matter I just don't see our culture right now (or anytime soon) supporting an outright ban on first trimester abortions."


The pro-abort crowd, at this time, is having a hard time
keeping their one lone remaining clinic in MS open.

Knowing MS folks as I do, I think you're gonna owe
bourbon a ten spot.

But, I have a feeling you would be very happy to pay up. ;o)

[CounterCounterCulture]

Thanks for doing this.

San Francisco: Walk For Life West Coast Anti-Abortion Reports & Pictures 1-21-06

CIVIL RIGHTS FOR ALL BUMP!

[dixiechick2000]

I DO love that license plate!
I'm very proud MS chose it.

[dixiechick2000]

YIKES!!!

Gross...
Looks like something you would see
in NOLA, during Mardi Gras. Ick...

[HitmanLV]

Yes, I'd have no problem paying up. ;-)

[victim soul]

thanks so much for posting these beautiful and inspiring pictures. I couldn't make it to the march this year.

[right-wingin_It]

Thanks all

[wardaddy]

PRE ROE IN 1972:

Only New York, Washington, Hawaii, and Alaska allowed abortions up to 24 weeks.

Colorado,California, Oregon, and North Carolina and 5 others allowed abortions for "rape, incest or in which pregnancy would lead to permanent physical disability"

Mississippi allowed for real "life of the mother".

Alabama for "woman's health".....which explains why Mississippi girls went to Alabama when I was a lad.

All of these laws were recent at the time....abortion being basically illegal with rare exception everywhere (as it should be)

Now given that history, you think whittling back Roe and granting states that authority again will not result in banning first trimester abortions as well.

That's an argument not supported by the evidence of history.

[WKB]

Sometimes you really impress me.