Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge Orders Release of Gitmo Detainee IDs (To AP)
AP/yahoo ^ | 01/23/06 | LARRY NEUMEISTER

Posted on 01/23/2006 8:38:28 PM PST by quantim

NEW YORK - A federal judge ruled Monday that the Defense Department must release the identities of hundreds of Guantanamo Bay detainees to The Associated Press.

U.S. District Judge Jed S. Rakoff told the government to provide the information in the form of unredacted copies of transcripts and documents related to 558 military hearings in which detainees were permitted to challenge their incarcerations.

Most of the hundreds of prisoners at the U.S. prison in Cuba have been held since the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks without being charged or publicly identified, which has troubled human rights groups.

The AP filed its Freedom of Information Act lawsuit seeking the documents last year. The government then turned over the transcripts of 558 tribunals but redacted facts about each detainee's identity.

The judge gave the government until Wednesday to decide whether to appeal to the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals and ask him to suspend his order.

Earlier this month, the judge rejected government arguments that the detainees' names should be kept secret to protect their privacy, but gave the government one last chance to change his mind.

In response, the government argued that releasing the identities could subject the families, friends and associates of the detainees to embarrassment and retaliation.

In a written ruling Monday, the judge said he found that argument unconvincing. He said family members and the others "never had any reasonable expectation" of anonymity.

Many of the detainees were captured in Afghanistan, and are there, the Persian Gulf, Russia and other countries.

A spokeswoman for federal prosecutors, Heather Tasker, said the government had not seen the ruling and had no response.

AP attorney David A. Schulz said he expected the government to appeal.

"The judge has rejected the Defense Department's effort to use the privacy interests of detainees to prevent the public from learning information about the actions taken at Guantanamo Bay," he said.

Last year, the judge ordered the government to ask each detainee whether he or she wanted personal identifying information to be turned over to the AP as part of the lawsuit.

Of 317 detainees who received the form, 63 said yes, 17 said no, 35 returned the form without answering and 202 declined to return the form.

The judge said none of the detainees, not even the 17 who said they did not want their identities exposed, had a reasonable expectation of privacy during the tribunals.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: guantanamo; terrorismgitmo; treason
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 last
To: Ouderkirk

Cute. Real cute.

heh heh heh


41 posted on 01/24/2006 2:57:56 PM PST by SmithL (Sarchasm: The gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the person who doesn't get it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

Just f***ing unbelievable? Your also a hypocrite! language like that and a bible verse on the homepage!!! My Oh My


42 posted on 01/24/2006 8:47:58 PM PST by Boazo (From the mind of BOAZO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Boazo

I am quoting the Bible verse on my homepage because I believe it absolutely true but this does not mean that I am a saint or even a good Christian. In fact I am the worst sinner. Are you happy now.


43 posted on 01/24/2006 8:51:02 PM PST by jveritas (Hate can never win elections.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: quantim

Claim Commander-In-Chief privlege. Same argument as any executive privilege.


44 posted on 01/24/2006 8:55:12 PM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson