Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PapaBear3625; SunkenCiv; blam
wow, a thread resurrected from 2006. What was I doing in January 2006. I think I had just been 6 months in a new job in JP Morgan Chase and was using my down time to catch up on the history threads

Anyway, Papabear, to your point, Mesopotamia was first populated by Sumerians, who seem related to Elamites and the Harappan civilisation.

Most likely these were all Dravidians -- the Sumerians called themselves Sa-gi-ga or the black headed people

Now, the Dravidians are Caucasians, just not Indo-Europeans (just as Semites are Caucasians but not Indo-Europeans)

So your point about Egyptians being Caucasians (through the AfroAsiatic branch that includes Semites and Berbers), yes, but not to the Indo-European/Aryan branch

61 posted on 07/07/2013 11:18:31 AM PDT by Cronos (Latin presbuteros>Late Latin presbyter->Old English pruos->Middle Engl prest->priest)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]


To: Cronos
So your point about Egyptians being Caucasians (through the AfroAsiatic branch that includes Semites and Berbers), yes, but not to the Indo-European/Aryan branch

I do not disagree with anything you said. I was just positing that the Egyptians and North Africans might be descended from people who migrated there from southwest Asia, rather than being natively African.

62 posted on 07/07/2013 12:13:26 PM PDT by PapaBear3625 (You don't notice it's a police state until the police come for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson