[TheBrotherhood]

>Explain why his own daughter denied the story that he had recanted.

Why would she deny something that never took place in the first place? It don't make no sense. You deny something that was, not something that was not.

Anyway, I've never read that her daughter denied his recanting. I'll research this issue and see what I can find. But I doubt I'll find such a denial by his daughter. If I haven't found it, it ain't there; and, if it ain't there, it never happened - the daughter's denial, that is.

I'll research this very important issue and let you all know of my definite, authoritative, and final findings.

[Dimensio]

Why would she deny something that never took place in the first place?

Because it was being falsely reported before she denied it. If you'd read the references that people had given you when you first made the false claim, you would know this. However, you clearly do not want to own up to the fact that you were clearly mistaken and that even professional creationist resources dispute your claim, so you willfully run away from any evidence that contradicts your position, because you are a coward.

Anyway, I've never read that her daughter denied his recanting.

You are a liar.

[freedumb2003]

Why would she deny something that never took place in the first place? It don't make no sense. You deny something that was, not something that was not.

Another strawman. Dang, you so-called Christians lie like dogs.

She deines it because others assert it. If I say you are green and you deny it, it doesn't somehow suggest there was nothing to deny.

How do you get up in the morning? Do your morning prayers include "Dear God, let me be a good liar and not get caught again"?