Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Stoat
His civilian gay lover now stays with him in barracks instead.

&&
In the barracks!? What's up with that? Does not sound like military discipline to me. Can any British soldier bring some civilian into the barracks to live? What if he brought in a woman? Suppose he brought in a terrorist?

I don't pretend to know anything about our military's culture let alone that of the Brits, but, even ignoring the homo garbage, something's amiss here.
9 posted on 01/23/2006 12:49:28 PM PST by Bigg Red (Do not trust Democrats with national security!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Bigg Red
In the barracks!? What's up with that?

I *hope* its a difference in terminology. We really don't have barracks anymore, more like dormitories, with two or three "man" rooms. I don't think we allow civilians to live there, but I guess if it weren't for the shared bathroom facilities, I guess having a wife in there instead of a same sex roommate wouldn't be *too* disruptive.

However I suspect by "barracks" they mean something like "military provided quarters".

17 posted on 01/23/2006 12:56:40 PM PST by El Gato (The Second Amendment is the Reset Button of the U.S. Constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson