[RightResponse]

Yeah, I'm sure this will hit all the MSM newspapers...

[shield]

bttt

[EQAndyBuzz]

Ouch. Rush is talking about that now.

The libs are toast in 2006 if they think that they will win by undermining the administratiuons efforts on terrorism. Americans are too smart.

[SueRae]

Just the facts.

I won't hold my breath waiting for this to show up in Newsweek.

[Stentor]

.

[vigilence]

The best answer to these criticisms is to reject Congress' claim of power to make laws that undermine the Presidents' inherent Constitutional right to be Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces and his ability to wage war against our enemies. Not only signals intelligence from Civil War era telegraph intercepts but all intelligence gathering is part and parcel to conducting war and would even allow an "Echelon" type program while hostilities exist.

[manwiththehands]

I think the 'Rats have forgotten 9/11 and that we are at WAR.

Selective memory is an evil thing.

[Peach]

Ping to a new WH web site to defend the NSA program.

[talleyman]

"The Democratic response will be provided by Osama bin Laden."

[Bommer]

Once again The White House is 2 weeks too late! The White House has the reaction time of a 3 toes sloth!

[DustyMoment]

Yeah, Clinton never did anything like this, say, like using the IRS to audit people as an intimidation tool.



/sarc

[MNJohnnie]

Amazing. WH has been playing rope a dope for how many years and we STIll get Freepers whining about "finally responding" Some of you need to learn the value of letting your foes state out an indefensiable postion before counterattacking rathern then demand rapid responses EVERY time.