Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Noble Eagle' mission marks milestone for F-22A squadron(F-22's joins NORAD for US/Can security)
AirForce.mil ^

Posted on 01/23/2006 8:45:14 AM PST by MARKUSPRIME

01/23/2006 - LANGLEY AIR FORCE BASE, Va., (ACCNS) -- The 27th Fighter Squadron passed another milestone Jan. 22 after completing an Operation Noble Eagle mission in the F-22A.

The Jan. 21 and 22 mission over the U.S. marks the first operational mission in the new fighter aircraft since it was declared Initial Operational Capable in December.

Operation Noble Eagle provides air defense over the U.S. and Canada in order to prevent a future 9-11 type attack. Since the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, North American Aerospace Defense Command fighters have responded to more than 2,000 air events within the United States and Canada, and have flown more than 40,000 sorties in support of Operation Noble Eagle.

This vital mission is the first to fall to the 27th FS since they converted to the F-22A.

(Excerpt) Read more at 2.acc.af.mil ...


TOPICS: Canada; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; US: Virginia
KEYWORDS: f22a; homelandsecurity; langleyafb; nobleeagle; norad; usaf
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last
I like the Idea of the F-22A being an interceptor for North America.


1 posted on 01/23/2006 8:45:17 AM PST by MARKUSPRIME
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MARKUSPRIME


How would you like to be a young USAF LT. assigned that aircraft?

Hopefully, we deploy a squadron to the med...for operational use against Iran.


2 posted on 01/23/2006 8:50:39 AM PST by in hoc signo vinces ("Houston, TX...a waiting quagmire for jihadis. American gals are worth fighting for!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MARKUSPRIME

> This vital mission ...

Umm, why do we want to waste a low-observable in a region
where that is irrelevant?

Or is this just sea trials?


3 posted on 01/23/2006 8:52:53 AM PST by Boundless
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boundless

"why do we want to waste a low-observable in a region
where that is irrelevant?"

Part of our Canada invasion plans, ya know.

In seriousness, I would assume they are still working out the kinks, "operational" or not.


4 posted on 01/23/2006 8:54:57 AM PST by MeanWestTexan (Many at FR would respond to Christ "Darn right, I'll cast the first stone!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Boundless

Well its probably to give the pilots an actual mission while waiting for the proverbial sh*t to hit the fan somewhere overseas.


5 posted on 01/23/2006 8:55:19 AM PST by MARKUSPRIME
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Boundless


"Sea trails" more likely.

I'd assume this mission is for pilot familiarity with the aircraft, before being forward deployed.


6 posted on 01/23/2006 8:55:26 AM PST by in hoc signo vinces ("Houston, TX...a waiting quagmire for jihadis. American gals are worth fighting for!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: in hoc signo vinces
Hopefully, we deploy a squadron to the med...for operational use against Iran.

My thought precisely. But, honesty, I think that a squadron of F-117s would do the trick just fine.

And, if not that, a group of B52s with MOABs, pin-point right onto the President's palace. BOOM! Buh-bye, Hitler.

7 posted on 01/23/2006 8:56:55 AM PST by mattdono (The New 'Rat math: 0.0000017% = Vast Wiretapping of "Americans" Riiiggghhhhtttt...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mattdono


F-22's can fly fighter escort for the Buffs and/or wild weasel missions to take out SAM sites.


8 posted on 01/23/2006 8:59:37 AM PST by in hoc signo vinces ("Houston, TX...a waiting quagmire for jihadis. American gals are worth fighting for!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: mattdono

It also might be a good tool to see if Chinese or Russian fighters are probing our air defenses. The Raptor could creep up on them easier than a regular fighter.


9 posted on 01/23/2006 9:00:29 AM PST by MARKUSPRIME
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MeanWestTexan

Part of our Canada invasion plans, ya know.

Ixnay, MWT!!!  Didn't you get Rove's secret message on the Klan-fone?

Owl_Eagle

(If what I just wrote makes you sad or angry,

 it was probably sarcasm)

10 posted on 01/23/2006 9:01:01 AM PST by End Times Sentinel (In Memory of my Dear Friend Henry Lee II)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MARKUSPRIME

Real nice plane and it should be.. they have been working on this for decades. Back in the Big One,,the USA was able to put a fighter into combat in months, from drawings, to production, and on to war.


11 posted on 01/23/2006 9:03:45 AM PST by brainstem223
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boundless
Umm, why do we want to waste a low-observable in a region where that is irrelevant?

My understanding is that all US-based fighter squadrons are rotated through Noble Eagle duty, regardless of type (F-15C, F-16 and now F-22) and/or status (Actives, Reserves, National Guard).

The 27th was just put back into the rotation (it's parent wing, the 1st, responded over Washington during 9-11 and did CAP duty over the area) following conversion to the F-22.
12 posted on 01/23/2006 9:04:55 AM PST by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: tanknetter

That's my understanding as well. God speed to the 27th and all members of our armed forces.


13 posted on 01/23/2006 9:08:04 AM PST by clawrence3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: MARKUSPRIME

a production run of 5000 planes would reassure me. 125 of them and its really "So What?" in an extended war.


14 posted on 01/23/2006 9:08:41 AM PST by wildcatf4f3 (the friend of my enemy is my enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wildcatf4f3


We can always make more, right?

Plus the F-22A is a force multiplier, meaning one plane is worth about 6 F-15s in the skies above a battlefield.

How many SU-27s or MiG-30's would it take to bring one down? (That's If they'd even get close enough to take a shot or had a pilot worth their salt.)

There's no "so what" about this plane.


15 posted on 01/23/2006 9:13:18 AM PST by in hoc signo vinces ("Houston, TX...a waiting quagmire for jihadis. American gals are worth fighting for!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: MARKUSPRIME

"The Raptor could creep up on them easier than a regular fighter."

Yeah, but the way those things work, we generally don't REALLY want to sneak up on them.

Unlike China, we generally want them to see us and turn tail without real confrontation --- although a turn-about-fair play shoot down of a Chinese bogey over Alaskan territory would be nice.


16 posted on 01/23/2006 9:20:46 AM PST by MeanWestTexan (Many at FR would respond to Christ "Darn right, I'll cast the first stone!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: wildcatf4f3

Actually the production number is 183. Then they will see if congress will fund more.


17 posted on 01/23/2006 9:24:33 AM PST by MARKUSPRIME
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: MARKUSPRIME

F-22's along with F-15's,f-16's,f-18's, and the F-35's that will be coming out in a few years will definately be very formitable and a huge force multiplier.


18 posted on 01/23/2006 9:26:54 AM PST by MARKUSPRIME
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Boundless

The F-22A can dash at supersonic speeds for a lot longer than an F-15. The F-22 doesn't have to use afterburners to acheive supersonic speeds, providing for a quicker intercept.

Also, they probably want to iron out all the kinks here rather than deploy them to a place where everyone is an enemy (no friendly place to land).


19 posted on 01/23/2006 9:34:10 AM PST by Londo Molari
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MARKUSPRIME

we lost 8588 aircraft and choppers in Viet Nam. Russia is to introduce its 5th gen aircraft this year.


20 posted on 01/23/2006 9:34:31 AM PST by wildcatf4f3 (the friend of my enemy is my enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson