[Junior]

No science type graces ID with the term "theory." ID isn't even a testable hypothesis.

[PatrickHenry]

This thread's hopeless, but I should toss this in. It may save one person from a life of ignorance:

Help for new visitors to the evolution debate
Another service of Darwin Central, the conspiracy that cares.

If you're interested in learning about evolution, visit The List-O-Links.
If you're serious about debating this issue, see How to argue against a scientific theory.
If you're permanently stuck on stupid, but determined to post anyway, use the Evolution Troll's Toolkit.

[webstersII]

"ID isn't even a testable hypothesis."

Neither is evolution.

For example, many years ago it was much discussed that finding a "living fossil" would be a way to falsify evolution.

Then the coelacanth was found and they said it was a further proof of evolution, not a proof against evolution.