It is actually quite entertaining to hear the atheists go on about how ID is a theory but Evolution is a fact. LOL.
I'm a deist...not an atheist.
Evolution is a scientific theory.
ID is a faith-based belief.
FSM is a similar faith-based belief.
Neither ID nor FSM is a scientific theory.
Sounds more like religion to me. It's quite pathetic that lawyers and judges now determine what is science and what is not.
The "fossil record", for the most part was created at one specific period of time, which supports catastrophic event theory (real science with much more scientific support than evolution religion).
There never will be a fossil record showing transitional forms, because none existed at the time the fossil record was created, no did they ever.
The fossil "record" isn't being continuosly created today, because these creatures decay and or are eaten by scavengers before sufficient material can cover them to create a fossil.
Here's an intresting book for those who are tired of the far-fetched evolutionist gospel. fountains of the deep
Evolutionists are like muslims, no matter how much proof you present to them proving their prophet was the furtherst thing from one, they still refuse to accept the facts.
yes it is, I wonder if all the "conservatives" who post here also accept the majority scientific view that global warming is a fact just as non-critically as they accept evolution. Judging from their posts, the answer is YES. They should also be concerned about the majority academic position on all topics if they want to remain intellectually intact...but I fear it's too late.
Could you please supply a few examples of this?
Especially anyone calling ID a theory.
No science type graces ID with the term "theory." ID isn't even a testable hypothesis.