Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fallujah-nuker
"I think if they saw their child attacked by a wolf they would need to consider the fact that the wolf may have hungry pups in her den."

What exactly does that mean? The Iranian government wants to destroy Israel and the US, so we should go kill all Iranian children because nits make lice, baby rattlesnakes are more poisonous than big rattlesnakes (or whatever that nutjob wrote) and woves aren't just canines?

These posts are getting a bit formulaeic.

194 posted on 01/22/2006 11:41:31 AM PST by cake_crumb (Leftist Credo: One Wing to Rule them All and to the Darkside Bind them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies ]


To: cake_crumb

Actually my point is that they would allow the wolf to kill their own child so that the wolfs pups would have food to eat. In the wild if you kill the mother you also killed her young, that point was made very eloquently in "March of the Penguins" when a leopard seal killed a mother penguin while she was feeding. It meant that also her chick would die.

Israel should value her own young rather than the young of Iran, if Iranian children are at risk it is due to their own government.


287 posted on 01/22/2006 12:53:09 PM PST by fallujah-nuker (America needs more SAC and less empty sacs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson