Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: metmom
The Hebrew Bible (Old Testament) is accurate as A. a moral and religious document and B. a cultural/ anthropological study of the Near East circa the 9th/8th century B.C However, it isn't a historical document in which you could say X happened and then Y happened, etc.

In reality, no historical document from the ancient world could be considered accurate. For instance, Josephus' history of the Jewish Revolt, considered the definitive history of that time period, was biased because Josephus was more interested in explaining to his fellow Jews why they shouldn't have been revolting.
263 posted on 01/24/2006 4:40:33 PM PST by Accygirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies ]


To: Accygirl
In reality, no historical document from the ancient world could be considered accurate. For instance, Josephus' history of the Jewish Revolt, considered the definitive history of that time period, was biased because Josephus was more interested in explaining to his fellow Jews why they shouldn't have been revolting.

How does your "For instance" support the first sentence?

269 posted on 01/24/2006 5:58:07 PM PST by papertyger (We have done the impossible, and that makes us mighty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 263 | View Replies ]

To: Accygirl
...was biased because Josephus was more interested in explaining to his fellow Jews why they shouldn't have been revolting.

This is 'editorializing', not inaccuracy.

313 posted on 01/25/2006 6:14:25 AM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 263 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson