Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Luis Gonzalez
However, Genesis contains two distinctly different creation accounts.

What!?

First year bible students can figure THIS old canard out!

205 posted on 01/24/2006 11:53:41 AM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Elsie
Man's True Origins

To investigate what the Church really understands by the term "evolution," we interviewed Father Vittorio Marcozzi, Vatican specialist on anthropological studies.

Marcozzi was an advisor to three Popes and an expert at the Second Vatican Council on questions related to creation and evolution. He is well known for his rigorous research and balanced appraisals; his books on the subject have been translated into many languages and distributed worldwide. Recently, in spite of his advanced age of 88 years, Marcozzi was summoned by Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger to the Congregation of the Doctrine of the Faith to debate with eminent scientists who have written on evolution and creation.

"I agree with Cardinal Ratzinger that we cannot speak of creation versus evolution, but rather of creation and evolution," Marcozzi told Inside the Vatican. "To admit evolution does not necessarily signify denying God's intervention. There are at least three 'moments' when divine intervention is necessary and evident: the appearance of life, that is of the first living organisms; the evolutionary possibilities with which God imbues these organisms; and, finally, the coming of man, whose spiritual qualities implicate God's special intervention."

Do you mean that evolution is "guided" by God?

FATHER MARCOZZI: Evolution is not admissible without the mediation of a supreme Mind which established the laws of nature governing natural processes and which created nature itself. Although Church Fathers, such as St. Basil, St. Gregory of Nyssa and St. Augustine lacked a modern conception of evolution, they espoused ideas which approximated evolutionary theories. The Church Fathers maintained that God, in his first creative act, imbued matter with the "potentiality" or power to produce different animal and plant species. I favor the idea of evolution as a succession of beings, genetically related, but increasingly diverse and complex. The fundamental question is that of the first cause.

And how do you judge Darwin's theory?

MARCOZZI: For Darwin - a materialist criticized by his own wife for his lack of faith - evolution was set in motion by outside causal factors such as natural selection and the struggle for survival. According to the English scientist, all beings, including man, evolve from causal mutations. Apart from the absence of clear proofs for the intermediary forms of human existence, can we really believe that such marvelous beings, particularly man himself, are products of mere chance?

A billion and a half years have passed between the existence of one-celled and many-celled organisms, and yet there seem to be no intermediate forms linking the two.

These links are missing; they may never be found. What explains such great evolutionary leaps? Can they possibly be the result of material changes?

I rather see a divine intervention.

Can evolution be supported by the Bible?

MARCOZZI: There are two accounts of Genesis in the Bible. The more recent account describes creation in seven days and a repose on the Sabbath. The earlier account presumes that creation happened in one day.

The significance of both is that God created all things; evolution in no way contradicts this affirmation.

In synthesis, God created man from matter and then infused him with a spirit.

What is your opinion of the Holy Father's message to the Pontifical Academy of Science?

MARCOZZI: The Holy Father's message contains no specific recognition of Darwin or his theories.

John Paul II is proceeding along the doctrinal lines traced by the Popes before him. There are many different theories of evolution.

It is possible to accept evolution as a theory, while affirming that the spiritual and philosophical elements must remain outside the competence of science.

416 posted on 01/25/2006 7:25:22 PM PST by Luis Gonzalez (Some people see the world as they would want it to be, effective people see the world as it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson