Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Firebrand strategist to head Iran’s Air Force
Iran Focus ^ | 1/21/2006 | Staff

Posted on 01/21/2006 9:18:59 AM PST by Dark Skies

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last
To: Pukin Dog

The F 15 E is a FIGHTER Bomber, and can indeed mix it up air to air. Pity the camel jockey who goes up against one, he's gonna need a flying carpet to get home....


61 posted on 01/21/2006 11:05:53 AM PST by Kozak (Anti Shahada: " There is no God named Allah, and Muhammed is his False Prophet")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Robe
Did ya know William "hoot" Gibson who flew wild weasels then an was later Wing King at Aviano AB Italy ?


62 posted on 01/21/2006 11:10:26 AM PST by Squantos (Be polite. Be professional. But, have a plan to kill everyone you meet. ©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Kozak
Oh Brother.

The F-15 would be in serious trouble against an enemy front-line fighter. It is MUCH heavier than the F-15C, and carries those conformal fuel tanks adding even MORE weight. The mission profile of the -E is precision guided bombing. It does carry missiles for self-defense, but so does the occasional A-10 Warthog, which no one would mistake for a fighter either. The -E carries a lower sustained G rating, due to its heavier airframe, meaning it cannot maneuver anything like the F-15C.

These are facts.
63 posted on 01/21/2006 11:13:42 AM PST by Pukin Dog (Sans Reproache)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Dark Skies
C-SPAN broadcast a speech by Supreme Guardian Ali Khamenei to Iran's Air Force on 2/14/05. Go here to watch the video. Two things struck me, both dealing with the audience. One, they were bored out of their skulls and two, how old, sloppy, out of shape and unprofessional this military looked like.
64 posted on 01/21/2006 11:14:09 AM PST by Jabba the Nutt (Jabba the Hutt's bigger, meaner, uglier brother.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Let me tell you what is most likely to happen in Iran:

First, there will be a series of precision strikes against Iran's military infrastructure(command and control) combined with attacks against SOME of the nuclear facilities.

Next, there will be a ground invasion designed in coordination with Iran resistance to remove the Islamic leadership from power.

This exercise will very much resemble the attack against the Taliban, where the primary goal is only to remove the offending organization. Iran will become a democracy and dismantle their Nukes on their own with help from the IAEA.

65 posted on 01/21/2006 11:20:08 AM PST by Pukin Dog (Sans Reproache)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Kozak

I saw that episode.


Loved Monty Python!


66 posted on 01/21/2006 11:21:19 AM PST by RedMonqey (People who don't who stand for something, will fall for anything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog
Next, there will be a ground invasion designed in coordination with Iran resistance to remove the Islamic leadership from power.

And exactly which countries will carry out this ground invasion? In the (remote) event that Iran attacks US troops in Iraq, I fully support repelling the attack. Please clarify *who* should respond in the event that Germany, France, or Belgium is targeted.

67 posted on 01/21/2006 11:56:19 AM PST by ARealMothersSonForever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Jimmy Valentine
These guys sure can run their mouths well. Going to be interesting to see "what kind of chops they got".

Yeah. Considering how well their theories of asymmetrical warfare did against the lackluster Iraqi Army for eight years. Lot of big mouths writing checks their muscle can't cash.

68 posted on 01/21/2006 12:12:52 PM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog
create conditions that will raise global oil prices, something they have not been able to accomplish through OPEC.

uh...haven't global oil prices in recent months been hovering around all time highs?

But I agree, a lot of this signifyin' is for internal consumption. Iran seems to be more fractured and less stable politically than the lazy whores and jerkoffs of the western media have understood, and they give a false picture of the country's putative unity.

69 posted on 01/21/2006 12:18:46 PM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003
I don't think we have to worry about Iran's old Soviet-era "airforce."

I don't know what the Iranians have got since 1979, but they had a "70's era US Air Force". No spare parts from the US since then.

70 posted on 01/21/2006 12:20:48 PM PST by Jabba the Nutt (Jabba the Hutt's bigger, meaner, uglier brother.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: ARealMothersSonForever
Iran's alignment with Syria is not to be taken lightly,

Why? Syria has no military in the functioning sense of the word, and they don't even have any oil to speak of. We could occupy Syria in a weekend just with a spare division on TDY from Iraq, and never miss a beat anywhere else, and the Israelis would relish the opportunity to put paid to the Hezbollahs and Hamas and Islamic Jihadis and whatever other stray packs of rabid dogs are hiding there eating garbage outside Damascus.

71 posted on 01/21/2006 12:26:20 PM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: ARealMothersSonForever
Look, try not to fall into that trap of believing that our forces in Iraq constitute the bulk of our military, because they don't. Our forces are constructed to fight and win TWO major conflicts at a time. Iraq is winding down.

Beyond that, it would not take more than 30-50K troops to invade Iran. Their forces were almost completely wiped out fighting against Iraq. Their Air Force is a joke, and their Army would rather fight WITH us, rather then against us.

We would fight an insurgency for sure, but the need for huge numbers of combat troops is not there.
72 posted on 01/21/2006 12:26:52 PM PST by Pukin Dog (Sans Reproache)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Jabba the Nutt

I am assuming they got some tech from the Soviets in the 80's.

I suspect Iran's airforce is on par with the Iraqi Airforce in Desert Storm.

It lasted, what, 4 hours?


73 posted on 01/21/2006 12:27:45 PM PST by freedumb2003 (American troops cannot be defeated. American Politicians can.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog
F-15E Strike Eagle Although the slogan of the F-15's original design team was "Not a pound for air-to-ground," the F-15 has long been recognized as having superior potential in the ground attack role. In 1987 this potential was realized in the form of the F-15E Strike Eagle. The mission of the Strike Eagle is as succinct as that of its air-to-air cousin: to put bombs on target. The F-15E is especially configured for the deep strike mission, venturing far behind enemy lines to attack high value targets with a variety of munitions. The Strike Eagle accomplishes this mission by expanding on the capabilities of the air superiority F-15, adding a rear seat WSO (Weapon Systems Operator) crewmember and incorporating an entirely new suite of air-to-ground avionics.

The F-15E is a two seat, two engine dual role fighter capable of speeds up to MACH 2.5. The F-15E performs day and night all weather air-to-air and air-to-ground missions including strategic strike, interdiction, OCA and DCA. Although primarily a deep interdiction platform, the F-15E can also perform CAS and Escort missions. Strike Eagles are equipped with LANTIRN, enhancing night PGM delivery capability. The F-15E outbord and inboard wing stations and the centerline can be load with various armament. The outboard wing hardpoint are unable to carry heavy loads and are assign for ECM pods. The other hardpoints can be employed for various loads but with the use of multiple ejection racks (MERs). Each MER can hold six Mk-82 bombs or "Snakeye" retarded bombs, or six Mk 20 "Rockeye" dispensers, four CBU-52B, CBU- 58B, or CBU-71B dispensers, a single Mk-84 (907 kg) bomb F- 15E can carry also "smart" weapons, CBU-10 laser quided bomb based on the Mk 84 bomb, CBU-12, CBU-15, or another, laser, electro-optical, or infra-red guided bomb (including AGM-G5 "Marerick" air-to-ground) missiles.

Conformal Fuel Tanks were introduced with the F-15C in order to extend the range of the aircraft. The CFTs are carried in pairs and fit closely to the side of the aircraft, with one CFT underneath each wing. By designing the CFT to minimize the effect on aircraft aerodynamics, much lower drag results than if a similar amount of fuel is carried in conventional external fuel tanks. This lower drag translate directly into longer aircraft ranges, a particularly desirable characteristic of a deep strike fighter like the F-15E. As with any system, the use of CFTs on F-15s involves some compromise. The weight and drag of the CFTs (even when empty) degrades aircraft performance when compared to external fuel tanks, which can be jettisoned when needed (CFTs are not jettisonable and can only be downloaded by maintenance crews). As a result, CFTs are typically used in situations where increased range offsets any performance drawbacks. In the case of the F-15E, CFTs allow air-to-ground munitions to be loaded on stations which would otherwise carry external fuel tanks. In general, CFT usage is the norm for F15Es and the exception for F-15C/D's.

The F-15E Strike Eagle’s tactical electronic warfare system [TEWS] is an integrated countermeasures system. Radar, radar jammer, warning receiver and chaff/flare dispenser all work together to detect, identify and counter threats posed by an enemy. For example, if the warning receiver detects a threat before the radar jammer, the warning receiver will inform the jammer of the threat. A Strike Eagle’s TEWS can jam radar systems operating in high frequencies, such as radar used by short-range surface-to-air missiles, antiaircraft artillery and airborne threats. Current improvements to TEWS will enhance the aircraft’s ability to jam enemy radar systems. The addition of new hardware and software, known as Band 1.5, will round out the TEWS capability by jamming threats in mid-to-low frequencies, such as long-range radar systems. The equipment is expected to go into full production sometime in late 1999.

The Defense Department plans to sustain production of the F-15E for at least two more years, purchasing three aircraft in both FY 1998 and FY 1999. Without FY 1998 procurement, the F-15 production line would begin to close in the absence of new foreign sales. These six additional aircraft, together with the six aircraft approved by Congress in FY 1997, will sustain the present 132-plane combat force structure until about FY 2016. Under current plans by 2030, the last F-15C/D models will have been phased out of the inventory and replaced by the F-22.

It's still a better fighter then 99% of the stuff out there.
74 posted on 01/21/2006 12:36:19 PM PST by Kozak (Anti Shahada: " There is no God named Allah, and Muhammed is his False Prophet")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: RedMonqey

Looks Iran is trying to have life immitate art....


75 posted on 01/21/2006 12:37:05 PM PST by Kozak (Anti Shahada: " There is no God named Allah, and Muhammed is his False Prophet")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog
Look, try not to fall into that trap of believing that our forces in Iraq constitute the bulk of our military, because they don't.

This is true. Our entire force projection and capability is unknown. Suffice that we shall not be over extended. Our force protection is excellent. My contention is that a COMBINED force structure is most appropriate. Not that it could not be done on a unilateral basis.

76 posted on 01/21/2006 12:42:06 PM PST by ARealMothersSonForever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard
Syria has no military in the functioning sense of the word,Not to be rude, yet some may wish to research this assertion. Any country that has occupied another for more than 5 years must be recognized.
77 posted on 01/21/2006 12:45:59 PM PST by ARealMothersSonForever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Kozak
You really ought to save your energy.

I have flown against the F-15, both C and E. A few thousand more words is not going to sway me against my own experiences. Maybe while you are out doing all this research, you might look up VF-143?

Sheesh.
78 posted on 01/21/2006 1:25:05 PM PST by Pukin Dog (Sans Reproache)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Kozak

They picked the right genre.....farce.


79 posted on 01/21/2006 2:56:19 PM PST by RedMonqey (People who don't who stand for something, will fall for anything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Kozak
This is a recipe for Iranian national suicide martyrdom in Ahmadejihad's and his followers' blind eyes.
80 posted on 01/21/2006 3:17:01 PM PST by DoNotDivide (Romans 12:21 Be not overcome of evil, but overcome evil with good.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson