To: SuziQ
It would keep the air in cities much cleaner.But when people get home to the suburbs, the gas engine has to kick in to recharge the batteries and now the pollution ends up in the suburb where people and their kids live.
It's like pure electric cars. They claim they don't pollute. Sure they do. The power plant has to run more to generate the electricity to charge the cars, so the pollution comes out of their stack rather than the exhaust pipe. It's tough to get something for free in the car/energy game.
31 posted on
01/20/2006 11:29:40 AM PST by
Right Wing Assault
("..this administration is planning a 'Right Wing Assault' on values and ideals.." - John Kerry)
To: Right Wing Assault
You're not factoring in regenerative braking.
69 posted on
01/20/2006 12:15:03 PM PST by
Doohickey
(If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice...I will choose freewill.)
To: Right Wing Assault
It's like pure electric cars. They claim they don't pollute. Sure they do. The power plant has to run more to generate the electricity to charge the cars, so the pollution comes out of their stack rather than the exhaust pipe. Which is why I favor electric, or plugin-able hybrids, as well as a fast Nuclearization of our power grid. A win/win.
73 posted on
01/20/2006 12:18:41 PM PST by
Paradox
(Liberalism IS a religion.)
To: Right Wing Assault
It's tough impossible to get something for free in the car/energy game.Something to do with a "law" of thermodynamics, as I understand it.
84 posted on
01/20/2006 12:41:13 PM PST by
Designer
(Just a nit-pick'n and chagrin'n)
To: Right Wing Assault
But the suburbs are much more spread out and have trees and greenery which help mitigate the pollution.
103 posted on
01/20/2006 4:49:19 PM PST by
SuziQ
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson