Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Let me go out on a limb and call this a troubling sign.
1 posted on 01/20/2006 5:34:20 AM PST by Rutles4Ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last
To: Rutles4Ever

Where are they going to put it, China, Russia?


2 posted on 01/20/2006 5:35:35 AM PST by Dane ( anyone who believes hillary would do something to stop illegal immigration is believing gibberish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rutles4Ever

Freeze all assets now!


3 posted on 01/20/2006 5:35:55 AM PST by magellan ( by)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Admin Moderator

Story up (Admin, please change thread title and add link)

Iran says moving assets

http://today.reuters.com/news/newsarticle.aspx?type=topNews&storyid=2006-01-20T131906Z_01_L18188832_RTRUKOC_0_US-NUCLEAR-IRAN.xml&rpc=22

TEHRAN (Reuters) - Embroiled in a nuclear standoff with the West, Iran said on Friday it was moving its foreign assets to shield them from possible U.N. sanctions and flexed its oil muscles with a proposal to cut OPEC output.

"Yes, Iran has started withdrawing money from European banks and transferring it to other banks abroad," said a senior Iranian official, who asked not to be named.

Central Bank Governor Ebrahim Sheibani was quoted earlier as saying Tehran had started shifting funds, but he sidestepped a question on whether the assets would go to accounts in Asia.

It is far from clear how placing assets in Asia or anywhere abroad would protect them from being frozen as few governments or major banks would be willing to flout U.N. sanctions openly.

The United States and the European Union want the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) to refer Iran to the Security Council at an emergency meeting on February 2.

The council has the power to impose trade or diplomatic sanctions, though no swift action to punish Iran is likely.

Russia and China, which both have major commercial interests at stake in the Islamic Republic, have urged caution.

Iran's ambassador to the IAEA in Vienna said hauling his country to the council would be difficult because of the views of Russia, China and some European and developing countries.

"Sending Iran to the Security Council lacks a legal basis," Aliasghar Soltaniyeh told the semi-official Fars news agency.

Iran is trying to avoid U.N. censure or sanctions over its nuclear program, which it says is entirely peaceful. The West suspects it of secretly seeking nuclear weapons.

Talk of shifting foreign assets indicated how seriously the Islamic Republic is taking the threat of U.N. sanctions.

"We transfer foreign reserves to wherever we see as expedient. On this issue, we have started transferring," Sheibani told the ISNA students news agency.

Iran has bitter memories of its U.S. assets being frozen shortly after the 1979 Islamic revolution.

OIL JITTERS

Worries over Iran helped push oil above $67 on Friday and an Iranian proposal to slash a million barrels a day off OPEC production from April was not calculated to calm markets.

OPEC governor Hossein Kazempour Ardebili told the Mehr news agency the cut was needed because markets are oversupplied by some two million barrels per day, which he said could cause an oil price collapse in the second quarter of the year.

Most traders are more concerned about a shortage of spare capacity and an array of geopolitical risks than any glut.

China's state-run press urged Iran to halt nuclear work and return to talks with Britain, France and Germany, but argued against taking Tehran to the Security Council.

"Negotiations remain the best option, as sanctions will muddy the waters," the China Daily said in an editorial, saying Iran must return to negotiations with the European Union.

The EU trio scrapped the talks last week after Iran removed IAEA seals on uranium enrichment equipment and resumed a suspended nuclear research program. U.S. and EU officials say there can be no more talks unless Tehran reverses these steps.

"The international consensus is unmistakable and important," said the China Daily. "Iran should respond to the diplomatic efforts of the international community."

Iran is the world's fourth biggest oil exporter and the second largest in OPEC. Oil provides 80 percent of its export earnings, which have soared over the past two years.

Economists estimate Iran will have earned more than $40 billion in oil revenues by the end of the year to March 2006. Of this, $16 billion goes straight to budgeted government spending.

The rest goes to the Central Bank of Iran which keeps an unknown amount in foreign accounts. The Naftiran Intertrade Company (NICO), the powerful trade and financing arm of the National Iranian Oil Company, is based in Switzerland.

Shailesh Dash, head of strategic asset management at Kuwait's Global Investment House, said Iran might seek friendly havens for its funds in the Gulf or Asia.

"It's a similar pattern to that which we have seen for the Gulf countries after September 11. If you feel there is a risk of the U.S. imposing sanctions then it makes sense to move those assets to friendly countries, such as the Gulf or Asia."

Swiss banks would welcome asset transfers by Iran, a leading financial industry representative said.

"If you're talking in terms of a safe haven proposal, that's where Switzerland is very strong, stronger than Singapore or other places. We are a country that is non-judgmental," said Steve Bernard, director of the Geneva Financial Center.



4 posted on 01/20/2006 5:36:50 AM PST by Rutles4Ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rutles4Ever

Smart on their part. One of the first things we do is seize assets. However, this seems to be a sign that they realize something may be up.


5 posted on 01/20/2006 5:37:31 AM PST by TexGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rutles4Ever

Iran is full of troubling signs, They have suicidal tendencies, and dream of a National suicide bomb.

If the people of Iran dont make some kind of move against their government and straighten out the mess soon it may be too late. It would seem also that Syria wants to join them.


6 posted on 01/20/2006 5:37:43 AM PST by sgtbono2002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rutles4Ever

...before the USA can lock their bank accounts...


8 posted on 01/20/2006 5:39:22 AM PST by RedBloodedAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rutles4Ever


Yeah, that's one way to create a new oil bourse denominated in Euro's. What are they going to use now? Bhat?

Who's running the show over there?

I'm beginning to believe that the lead content of sand must be so high as to pollute the food chain. Or, insanity is endemic....


9 posted on 01/20/2006 5:40:49 AM PST by OpusatFR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rutles4Ever
Perhaps they will hid it in one of those impenetrable underground nuclear facilities.

Anyone that thinks that we don't have something to tear them to hell is fooling themselves. There is no processing plant you can put underground that doesn't have to have a way for people to get in and out, a way to get air in and out and a way to get equipment in and out.

14 posted on 01/20/2006 5:43:15 AM PST by Flint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rutles4Ever
Every morning I awake hoping to find that strikes against Iran have eliminated all of it's nuclear ambitions.

Screw all this posturing, let's get the job done now.

16 posted on 01/20/2006 5:45:38 AM PST by freedomson (Tagline comment removed by moderator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rutles4Ever

IMHO, this simple advances the time table for air strikes.


18 posted on 01/20/2006 5:48:32 AM PST by verity (The MSM is a National disgrace.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rutles4Ever

Yeah, they are as paranoid as they are delusional.


22 posted on 01/20/2006 5:51:34 AM PST by .cnI redruM (Shame, not sanctions - UN policy on Iran)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rutles4Ever

This situation is precisely what wars are for. Try to come up with another solution.


24 posted on 01/20/2006 5:57:11 AM PST by claudiustg (Go Bush! Go Sharon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rutles4Ever
The Arabs have been talking up gold since 9/11.

I think they want an Islamic dollar.

27 posted on 01/20/2006 5:59:15 AM PST by concrete is my business (prepare the sub grade, then select the mix design)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rutles4Ever
It seems like Iran is screaming for a fight.

This isn't going to help the euro market, but I wonder where the money is going.
31 posted on 01/20/2006 6:03:18 AM PST by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rutles4Ever

Sounds like they are planning to do something to upset almost everyone. they know their assets would be frozen. Considering it is Europe, they must be planning something really overt and atrocious.


33 posted on 01/20/2006 6:05:38 AM PST by rod1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rutles4Ever
News report has been on This Site for over an hour. Scroll down to this report "Oil Hits High; Iran Moves Bank Accounts."
35 posted on 01/20/2006 6:06:51 AM PST by ex-Texan (Mathew 7:1 through 6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rutles4Ever

Yesterday ElBaradi met with cheif diplomat from Iran who 'asked for more time' which of course he was granted (ElBaradi refusing to issue a condemnation requested by the EU).

Just more preperations so that IF sactions are put in (months down the road) they will have even LESS direct effect on the mad regime.


37 posted on 01/20/2006 6:12:53 AM PST by FreedomNeocon (I'm in no Al-Samood for this Shi'ite.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rutles4Ever

I would say this is a shot across the bow of the Europeans, in effect telling them that they had better not support The USA in any santions against Iran.


39 posted on 01/20/2006 6:16:10 AM PST by refermech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rutles4Ever; All

So that was why the president of Iran was visiting Syria. That is where he is moving the assets!


44 posted on 01/20/2006 6:26:20 AM PST by areafiftyone (Politicians Are Like Diapers, Both Need To Be Changed Often And For The Same Reason!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Rutles4Ever

With no seizable assets and Arab states likely willing to ignore UN sanctions, the UN is impotent to stop the Iranian nuclear program without using force.


47 posted on 01/20/2006 6:38:50 AM PST by The Great RJ ("Mir wölle bleiwen wat mir sin" or "We want to remain what we are." ..Luxembourg motto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson