Why are you demanding that ID be a proven entity; obviously, so called scientists in academe require no such constraint upon themselves in teaching Darwin...the real issue here, once and for all, revolves around our zeal, or lack thereof, of seeking questions and attempting to answer them in an academic environment. When we are scholars, we are at our finest hour in seeking ideas, later on we have to earn our keep in the workaday world and this restrains our perspective. The caterwauling from the evo crowd at the mere thought of introducing material other than orthodoxy (and for them,Darwin has here supplanted the God of the Bible) speaks volumes of their refusal to infuse the academic brew with a desirable spice of variety...
I did NOT demand that Creationism or ID be a "proven entity" before it is taught. Those are your words, not mine.
I have NEVER seen Creationism or ID try to prove anything. If you know of something where they did, let me know.
All I have ever seen them do is try to poke holes in Darwinism. There are lots of questions out there about Darwinism. However, just posing those questions does NOT prove Creationism or ID. That is all that I have ever seen Creationism or ID do.