[Ichneumon]

Is "Nature" magazine peer-reviewed?

Yes it is.

[Mamzelle]

So is "Science" magazine. Can we depend on the peers to review? After all, the Korean stem-cell scientist was "peer reviewed" so well that John Edwards used him to claim that Christopher Reed could be cured if it were not for the "anti-science" Republicans.

And I don't know if you've heard, but it turns out that trees produce methane (lots and lots of it) even when they're alive and not decaying. Global warming caused by global greening. A whole slew of biochemists missed out on that until just this week.

But our ears could smell--until we evolved. That's according to the peers who pitch their wares here--