Replies

The demonstration of an organ evolving provides tangible evidence against the idea, put forward by some proponents of creationism, that sensory organs are so intricate that they must have been designed by a higher being. Brazeau says: "It's a slap in the face to that kind of thinking."

This statement puts into doubt any objectivity on the part of the researcher. It appears the motive behind the work is not related to advancing scientific knowledge, but sticking a hot poker in the eye of those he detests.

[The demonstration of an organ evolving provides tangible evidence against the idea, put forward by some proponents of creationism, that sensory organs are so intricate that they must have been designed by a higher being. Brazeau says: "It's a slap in the face to that kind of thinking."]

This statement puts into doubt any objectivity on the part of the researcher.

His statement is objectively correct.

It appears the motive behind the work is not related to advancing scientific knowledge, but sticking a hot poker in the eye of those he detests.

It appears you are slandering his motives based on the fact that he makes a correct statement which you find uncomfortable for your beliefs.

And nowhere have you established in any way, nor is there anything in the article which suggests, that he "detests" people like you.

It looks to me as if you're engaging in either psychological projection, or paranoia. Maybe both.