Great argument. Google "mathematical science" and tell all those prestigious organizations that they're not using the term "science" correctly.
When discussing what a particular paradigm states, they'll flatly state what's in the theory, as in this example.
Sorry, Junior's argument was that scientists NEVER speak in absolutes. That's clearly an incorrect argument.
Results 1 - 10 of about 426,000 for "mathematical science" . (0.39 seconds)The forces of darkness still lead.
Results 1 - 10 of about 787,000 for "creation science" . (0.74 seconds)
Great argument. Google "mathematical science" and tell all those prestigious organizations that they're not using the term "science" correctly.
You were talking about 2+2, son. Would you be less confused if I had used the word "arithmetic" instead of "math"? Read things in context, so that you'll understand them better.
Sorry, Junior's argument was that scientists NEVER speak in absolutes. That's clearly an incorrect argument.
You know what he means, don't be coy. Stop trivially nitpicking semantics and maybe people might start to take you seriously for a change.