Nor am I.
And Im pretty astounded by the number of conservatives who are willing to surrender unlimited power to whoever happens to sit in the oval office for the duration of a possibly endless war (can you imagine a time when there is no one who wishes the US harm?)
My wife's desk is in the Sears Tower - now the tallest building in the country, and presumably short listed by possible terrorists so Ive though about this a lot. And my conclusion that in terms of what really matters long term ultimately she's safer there at least as long as this is a country where there are judicial checks on the legal powers of the executive branch - than in a country where the Maximum Leader makes whatever rules she or she prefers as tribal War-Lord.
At the moment, its often hard to get this point across some people are willing go to just about any length to avoid facing the question of possible abuse of such power.
But IMO when you see people such as Paul Weyrich being derided as liberal lap-dogs, you know the argument is off the rails - the problem with this sort of approach is that you have dismiss the opinions of ever larger numbers of thoughtful conservative commentators; if they are elected they are RINOs, if unelected, who do they represent?, if current members of government they are said to be disloyal, if they have left government service they are attacked as traitors, and so on.
Still, at the moment Im in the minority, and can only hope that a majority of voters come to their senses before such power is vested in someone really inimical to our traditional freedoms.
Thanks, I agree 100%