John Edwards received a blessing from Bishops Odell McCollum, left, and Timothy Clarke at First Church of God when he was running for president in 2004.
Posted on 01/17/2006 12:00:08 PM PST by Between the Lines
The Rev. Rod Parsley’s World Harvest Church and two affiliates always have obeyed federal tax laws, and an accusation to the contrary by 31 area pastors is "baseless and without merit," World Harvest said yesterday.
The 31 complained to the Internal Revenue Service on Sunday, accusing the church, its Center for Moral Clarity and a related group, Reformation Ohio, of violating IRS regulations by engaging in partisan politics. They asked for an IRS investigation of the three as well as two allied entities, Fairfield Christian Church of Lancaster and the Ohio Restoration Project.
But in a statement issued by Parsley’s spokesman, Mark Youngkin, World Harvest said the "left-leaning clergymen" have no case — although they do seem to have "a political agenda."
The statement questioned why the 31 went to the media on the eve of a federal holiday instead of approaching the church directly, "as people of faith are instructed to do in Scripture."
It also said Reformation Ohio has distributed 70 tons of food and assisted nearly 10,000 poor Ohioans. Parsley’s organizations have won 4,000 conversions to Christ while helping to register 400,000 new Ohio voters, many from urban neighborhoods, the statement said.
The complainants want the IRS to investigate whether Parsley and the pastor of Fairfield Christian, the Rev. Russell Johnson, have used their churches and affiliated organizations to promote the gubernatorial candidacy of Secretary of State J. Kenneth Blackwell.
They say Blackwell has been the only candidate showcased in a number of church-related events and activities.
If found to have violated IRS regulations, Parsley and Johnson could lose their tax-exempt status.
In an interview Sunday night, Johnson said Blackwell has been invited to Ohio Restoration Project events because of his vocal support for the group’s key issues, including opposition to abortion rights and same-sex marriage.
John Green, a University of Akron religion-and-politics authority, said there is a long tradition of political activity in America’s black churches.
"There’s no question that what goes on in the black church . . . is very much like what Parsley and Johnson are doing," he said.
Many black churches permit a number of competing candidates to be recognized in the audience or speak from the altar, Green said, and where "there is evidence of equal or bipartisan treatment, that could be mitigating."
He predicted that the complaint will "provoke a firestorm of opposition from the right," including the possibility of IRS counter-complaints.
The most problematic issue involves the alleged preference for Blackwell, who has courted the religious-right vote.
"I’m not picking on Blackwell because he’s not the subject of the complaint, but it appears that he is the only (gubernatorial candidate) invited to their events," Green said. "This would look like a potential violation of the rules against partisan politics."
One clergy member who signed the complaint, the Rev. Eric Williams, pastor of North Congregational United Church of Christ, wrote a column for The Dispatch in October 2004 urging the defeat of state Issue 1, the constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage that voters later approved.
Yesterday, Williams said he considered the essay permissible because it dealt with a social issue, not a specific candidate.
"I think that it’s valid and important that we (churches) focus on issues," he said.
The 31 pastors say World Harvest and Fairfield Christian are "acting as politicalcampaign organizations," Williams said. He said he did not expect the complaint to provoke similar accusations against the pastors who filed it.
But it could bring scrutiny to the practices of others, such as those who appear to endorse candidates from the pulpit.
On Feb. 23, 2004, The Dispatch published a photo of John Edwards, then a North Carolina senator and candidate for the Democratic presidential nomination, appearing at First Church of God on Refugee Road. The photo shows Bishops Odell McCollum and Timothy J. Clarke with their hands on Edwards’ shoulders, blessing him.
McCollum, who died in August, was president of the United Holy Church of America. Clarke is First Church’s senior pastor; efforts yesterday to reach him were unsuccessful.
Williams said he was unfamiliar with the photo, but that it might indicate "inappropriate" political activity that warranted investigation. The 31 pastors want the IRS rules clarified and applied equally to everyone, he said.
The Rev. David Van Dyke, who was among the 31, said he would never bring in a single candidate to speak at Broad Street Presbyterian Church, where he is pastor. He noted, for example, that in 1980, Ronald Reagan, who was the Republican candidate for president, worshipped at the church but did not speak.
Van Dyke said discussing issues from the pulpit is different because they tend to be nonpartisan. He said he preached from the pulpit in 2004 about Issue 1, which defined marriage as being between a man and a woman.
Van Dyke said Parsley also had the right to proclaim his support for Issue 1. But at the same time, he was critical of Parsley, because he said the pro-Issue 1 campaign that the World Harvest pastor helped lead was "a disingenuous attempt to turn out a certain segment of voters" to help particular candidates.
The Rev. John Coats, chairman of the Ohio Coalition of Concerned Citizens, a predominantly black political-action group, said yesterday that the complaint to the IRS demonstrates a need for federal and state governments to explain better to churches what political activities are permissible.
Coats, a Republican, said he suspects a political motive behind the complaint. Nevertheless, he said, the IRS should ascertain whether World Harvest and Fairfield Christian are "right or wrong in their procedures."
Coats is a pastor at the Word Church of God and Christ in Columbus. Although he does not fully support Parsley’s political agenda, he said, he does favor churches’ involvement in politics legally through political-action committees.
Since 2001, Rep. Walter Jones, R-N.C., has been pushing the Houses of Worship Free Speech Restoration Act, which would allow religious figures to endorse candidates. A Web site for the bill says its advocates include Ohio Republican Reps. John Boehner of West Chester, Steve Chabot of Cincinnati, Bob Ney of Heath, Michael G. Oxley of Findlay, Pat Tiberi of Genoa Township and Michael Turner of Dayton.
Backers and critics of the bill disagree over how much discussion of political issues, as opposed to candidates, is allowed in houses of worship.
John Edwards received a blessing from Bishops Odell McCollum, left, and Timothy Clarke at First Church of God when he was running for president in 2004.
This is known as having a "keen sense for the obvious."
Ok, who else is going to admit that they, like me, had to read the article to find out whether they were conservative or liberal before making a decision as to whether this was legal or illegal?
I had a "Christian" attorney sue me before coming to me directly in a dispute over legal fees.
I stopped trusting his loyalty and integrity. I was right. He went over my head and behind my back through the courts in spite of what Christians are instructed to do in scripture.
These 31 sound like the same type of weasels.
There is such a simple solution. Churches do not have to file for 501c3 nonprofit status. If they do not, they do not have to silence themselves on political issues. If they do file for that status, then they are prohibited by law from political action.
So...don't file for that status, and you can say whatever you want and campaign openly for candidates, etc.
IMO, that's the best route.
Interesting site here:
http://hushmoney.org/
Indeed.
The unincorporated church movement has been growing for at least 15 years, probably longer. IMO, it's the right thing to do.
"The unincorporated church movement has been growing for at least 15 years, probably longer. IMO, it's the right thing to do."
I agree completely. The unincorporated church can speak its mind as it wishes. I see no drawbacks.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.