To: CarolinaGuitarman
f you ignore the evidence of the physical creation... Yes, it is creation not a random happening - what evidence by the way is being ignored? A pig tooth or moths glued on a tree trunk or fully formed fossils?
120 posted on
01/17/2006 1:58:30 PM PST by
DaveyB
(Peace follows victory - never before)
To: DaveyB
" Yes, it is creation not a random happening - what evidence by the way is being ignored?"
By creationists? Just about everything.
"A pig tooth or moths glued on a tree trunk or fully formed fossils?"
Nebraska man was a mistake, that didn't convince the scientific community, and was discarded after about 3 years. The peppered moth studies are valid science. 2 moths were glued to a tree for a comparison photo to show the different coloration. The rest of the photos were of individual moths resting on the trunks of trees, in the wild. It is a very common practice in insect photography to fasten the subject down. There was no faking involved in that study.
As for your *fully formed fossils* remark, it shows an incredible ignorance of what would be expected from the fossil record.
I repeat, in order for creationists to believe what they do they must ignore the evidence of the physical creation.
123 posted on
01/17/2006 2:03:32 PM PST by
CarolinaGuitarman
("There is grandeur in this view of life...")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson