Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Earth Doomed (according to renowned British scientist)
TerraDaily ^ | January 16, 2006

Posted on 01/17/2006 7:43:06 AM PST by NYer

Renowned scientist James Lovelock says he believes the world has passed the point of no return for climate change, and civilization is unlikely to survive.

Thirty years ago Lovelock conceived the idea that Earth possesses a planetary-scale control system he named Gaia, which keeps our environment fit for life, The Independent reported Monday. But now he believes mankind's abuse of the environment has made climate change insoluble and life on Earth will never be the same again.

In an extraordinarily pessimistic new assessment published in Monday's Independent, Lovelock suggests efforts to counter global warming cannot succeed, and that, in effect, it is already too late.

Lovelock now believes Earth and human society face nearly complete disaster, and sooner than nearly anybody realizes.

He writes, "Before this century is over, billions of us wil! l die, and the few breeding pairs of people that survive will be in the Arctic, where the climate remains tolerable."


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: chickenlittles; evolution; greenpeacenutbar
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-104 next last
To: NYer

To hell with personal responsibility. The Earth will soon be destroyed!! quack quack


21 posted on 01/17/2006 7:51:56 AM PST by o_zarkman44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro

Minorities and women hardest hit.


22 posted on 01/17/2006 7:52:11 AM PST by TXBSAFH ("I would rather be a free man in my grave then living as a puppet or a slave." - Jimmy Cliff)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: sitetest

I was about to say "Before the century is over, just about everyone alive today will be dead."


23 posted on 01/17/2006 7:52:34 AM PST by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: NYer
Doomed!


24 posted on 01/17/2006 7:53:18 AM PST by xcamel (Exposing clandestine operations is treason. 13 knots make a noose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv

Perhaps, but it will still get too hot. If you take a star like Arcturus, which is about as luminous as the Sun will be as a red giant (Arcturus was probably similar to, or slightly bigger and brighter than the Sun in it's youth), you find that the area where a planet would be comfortable is around the distance of Uranus or so. So if we moved Earth, eventually we'd crash it into Mars or Jupiter, or at least run a major danger as we cross other planets' orbits.


25 posted on 01/17/2006 7:53:34 AM PST by RockinRight ("It's as if all the brain-damaged people in America got together and formed a voting bloc" - Coulter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: NYer

What a tool............


26 posted on 01/17/2006 7:54:06 AM PST by taxed2death (A few billion here, a few trillion there...we're all friends right?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DuncanWaring

Unless of course medical advances prolong the average lifespan as I think will be the case, in which case a majority of people alive today could very well be alive in 2100, at least in developed nations.


27 posted on 01/17/2006 7:54:19 AM PST by AntiGuv (™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz

See he's completely nuts. We would survive in the Antarctic, where the presence of land would make it even more tolerable.


28 posted on 01/17/2006 7:55:23 AM PST by Netheron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: NYer

"Before this century is over, billions of us will die . . ."

Six and a half billion or so right now. More than 90 years to go before the end of the century. Yep, I bet he's right.


29 posted on 01/17/2006 7:56:09 AM PST by Cap Huff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer
Earth Doomed

Oh my..I hope I am out of town when the earth is destroyed..

30 posted on 01/17/2006 7:56:33 AM PST by BerniesFriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer
He writes, "Before this century is over, billions of us will die

Let's see, 6 billion people alive right now. By the end of the century the youngest of those will be 94 years old. Unless there is a great increase in life span, I think most of those 6 billion will be dead by 2100. So I agree, billions of us will die before the century is over.

31 posted on 01/17/2006 7:56:40 AM PST by KarlInOhio (Hey Fat Ted: Alito is the judge, Mojito is what you're drinking. Try to remember the difference.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv

But it's too late for the dinosuars. sniff......


32 posted on 01/17/2006 7:57:05 AM PST by massgopguy (massgopguy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Dirt worshiper.


33 posted on 01/17/2006 7:57:28 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz

Not only should be drill in the ANWR, we should station plenty of breeding pairs there so we can maintain our lone superpower status. ;)


34 posted on 01/17/2006 7:59:04 AM PST by WestTexasWend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: NYer
Well, I guess the Kyoto Accord would not have made a lame rat's a$$ worth of difference, now, would it?

Maybe they can all go home and attempt more hedonistic pursuits while they wait for the end (and STFU in the process).

35 posted on 01/17/2006 7:59:10 AM PST by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer
Well, I guess the Kyoto Accord would not have made a lame rat's a$$ worth of difference, now, would it?

Maybe they can all go home and attempt more hedonistic pursuits while they wait for the end (and STFU in the process).

36 posted on 01/17/2006 7:59:16 AM PST by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight

If we moved the earth there would be no reason whatsoever to cross the orbits of other planets. First of all, the planets each orbit at their own unique incline. In order to pass the actual orbit of another planet, we'd have to do it on purpose. Secondly, even in the minuscule chance that we did cross the actual orbit of another planet (the orbit is a ring, not a sphere), there don't see why it'd have to be during the short time that the other planet is at the cross-point, rather than, say, the other side of the sun. But that's irrelevant, because there's an absurdly low chance in the above scenario that we'd move the earth into another planet's incline anyhow. If you were looking at the solar system from the side, the earth would be passing well below or above wherever Mars or Jupiter was orbiting.

And the location that we'd need at the peak of the red giant stage is approximately 2/3 between the current location of Mars and Jupiter. And as I mentioned, the current consensus is that earth will move in any event, and so will the other planets since they're of course subject to the same fluctuations in the sun's gravity.


37 posted on 01/17/2006 7:59:39 AM PST by AntiGuv (™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

See, I thought that when the sun expanded to "red-giant" stage, in about 5 billion years, that was when global warming would destroy the earth. I guess the evil SUV's are getting a jump on that bit of bad news.


38 posted on 01/17/2006 7:59:47 AM PST by willgolfforfood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Sounds like Jimmy needs some Prozac.


39 posted on 01/17/2006 7:59:53 AM PST by Max in Utah (By their works you shall know them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DuncanWaring

Dear DuncanWaring,

One wonders if the fellow realized the obviousness of his "forecast."

LOL.


sitetest


40 posted on 01/17/2006 7:59:56 AM PST by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-104 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson