Replies

From your post:
"I don't have the time to list them all, but let's note that the Fourth Amendment secures our persons, papers, and PROPERTY against any search carried out without judicial fiat."
Except in time of war. Remember in one of your earlier rantings (post #29) how you asked "Will someone finally hunt down and kill Osama?" This is something called the "War on Terror".

"Under the buncom Patriot Act, the judicial fiat is carried out after the fact, and the storm troopers can ram their way into your house any time they like."
First of all, what in the heck does "buncom" mean? I haven't found it in the dictionary (Oxford English). I never heard that in a wiretap that the court order was issued after the wiretapping was done except in extreme cases. A couple of Muslims yakking on the phone about which building they should target is obviously an extreme case. Wouldn't you agree? As an aside, try to reserve the term "stormtrooper" for you DU postings

"Only a shill for corporate America would keep our borders wide open in time of war in order to assure the business class of a massive supply of cheap labor to undercut Americans."
Shill for corporate America? Which union are you posting this for?

"I can go on but you used bold type, which means you are fleeing from cognitive dissonance, and wouldn't listen anyway."
I typed your original postings in blue type so that it would be easier to distinguish who said what. It makes it easier for everyone reading the postings. I did not type in bold type. You do see the difference, don't you? Blue type is very different from bold type. Yes?
"Fleeing from cognitive dissonance". Please.