To: Beelzebubba
"Why not let the people of each state decide these difficult moral choices, since you and I are currently unavailable to impose our values on them the way the leftists seem to want to on us?"They can. There's nothing in the federal law against allowing the people of each state to decide these difficult moral choices. The people of each state have always had the decision.
They just can't use controlled substances to do it. I suspect we'll hear from Congress on this.
To: robertpaulsen
They just can't use controlled substances to do it.
And why does anyone morally care whether doctors use carbon monoxide, bloodletting, or morphine?
How do those morally opposed to the practice justify opposition to a particular means?
Why bother? Just to be a pest to inconvenience others with different moral views?
I'm not being critical, just curious?
1,085 posted on
01/20/2006 6:08:54 AM PST by
Atlas Sneezed
(Your FRiendly FReeper Patent Attorney)
To: robertpaulsen
They just can't use controlled substances to do it.Do you really believe that this is the objection of the Justice Department?
1,086 posted on
01/20/2006 8:00:33 AM PST by
highball
("I find that the harder I work, the more luck I seem to have." -- Thomas Jefferson)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson