To: robertpaulsen
They just can't use controlled substances to do it.
And why does anyone morally care whether doctors use carbon monoxide, bloodletting, or morphine?
How do those morally opposed to the practice justify opposition to a particular means?
Why bother? Just to be a pest to inconvenience others with different moral views?
I'm not being critical, just curious?
1,085 posted on
01/20/2006 6:08:54 AM PST by
Atlas Sneezed
(Your FRiendly FReeper Patent Attorney)
To: Beelzebubba
"And why does anyone morally care whether doctors use carbon monoxide, bloodletting, or morphine?"Or whether doctors use a bludgeon, smother with a plastic bag, or a .45 in the mouth? Some ways are unacceptable that's all, controlled substances among them.
I'm sure these "doctors" can find another way to kill their patients. They're smart.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson