Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: robertpaulsen
They just can't use controlled substances to do it.


And why does anyone morally care whether doctors use carbon monoxide, bloodletting, or morphine?

How do those morally opposed to the practice justify opposition to a particular means?

Why bother? Just to be a pest to inconvenience others with different moral views?

I'm not being critical, just curious?
1,085 posted on 01/20/2006 6:08:54 AM PST by Atlas Sneezed (Your FRiendly FReeper Patent Attorney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1084 | View Replies ]


To: Beelzebubba
"And why does anyone morally care whether doctors use carbon monoxide, bloodletting, or morphine?"

Or whether doctors use a bludgeon, smother with a plastic bag, or a .45 in the mouth? Some ways are unacceptable that's all, controlled substances among them.

I'm sure these "doctors" can find another way to kill their patients. They're smart.

1,091 posted on 01/20/2006 5:16:41 PM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1085 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson