Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SueRae

DNA would only prove that Zawahiri was present. He could have only suffered a minor injury or could have been killed on the other extreme. DNA evidence is the same as fingerprint evidence, only DNA is more precise.


61 posted on 01/17/2006 6:07:41 AM PST by monocle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: monocle
DNA would only prove that Zawahiri was present.

Not necessarily. For instance (and without being too graphic), let's say the DNA was extracted from a portion of his heart chamber or brain stem. I'm no physician or medical examiner, but I think I could make an educated guess as to his current status. :-)

63 posted on 01/17/2006 6:11:27 AM PST by Coop (FR = a lotta talk, but little action)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

To: monocle

Kind of depends on the piece you're testing though, doesn't it. I mean if you have, say, a plastic bag full of gray matter, you pretty much know.


65 posted on 01/17/2006 6:12:34 AM PST by LikeLight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson