[Cap Huff]

That NYT published photo of the boy, the old man and the 'artillery shell as missile' was too clever by half. That got pulled, but it should have been a big deal when it got exposed for what it was, jihadi propaganda.

[okie01]

That NYT published photo of the boy, the old man and the 'artillery shell as missile' was too clever by half. That got pulled, but it should have been a big deal when it got exposed for what it was, jihadi propaganda.

And the Times only has two excuses for that gaffe -- either a.) they were too dumb to know the difference or b.) they're willingly playing propaganda footsie with the bad guys.

Neither is anything to brag about...

[eleni121]

I saw that photo and it was obviously a fake at worst and a set up at best.

Oh and Yippee on the terrorist kills! Unleash those drones.