Why Are Darwinists So Afraid of Intelligent Design?

Human Events ^ | Jan 17, 2006 | Barney Brenner

[King Prout]

toenails: more robust and flavorful and "al dente"

[moog]

the fact that no one knows everything - indeed, that the sum of all human knowledge is miniscule in comparison to human ignorance - is a source of delight to me: there is so much left to learn. that's what science is about, at root.

NOW I can appreciate this statement. Science is fascinating and I can't wait to see what we find out and yet I am uncertain where it will take us. It will indeed be a wild ride.

[moog]

toenails: more robust and flavorful and "al dente"

Do those grains of dirt taste good?:)

[moog]

Gotta run. See ya.

[King Prout]

Do those grains of dirt taste good?:)

them thangs puts harr on yer chest, bo-ah!

[moog]

them thangs puts harr on yer chest, bo-ah!

Ok, now you can take the tape off:)

[Ichneumon]

There are no transitional species,

See below.

if there were, the Darwinsits would be lifting them up high and trumpeting to the world that they've discovered the "Holy Grail of Evolution".

They're reported in the science journals very regularly, and show up in the newspapers pretty damned often too, son. It's not our fault you have your eyes tightly closed.

Index to Creationist Claims: Claim CC200: There are no transitional fossils.

Taxonomy, Transitional Forms, and the Fossil Record

On Creation Science and "Transitional Fossils"

The Fossil Record: Evolution or "Scientific Creation"

No transitional fossils? Here's a challenge...

Phylum Level Evolution

Paleontology: The Fossil Record of Life

Cuffey: Transitional Fossils

What Is A Transitional Fossil?

More Evidence for Transitional Fossils

The Origin of Whales and the Power of Independent Evidence

Transitional Forms of Whales

Fossil Horses FAQs

PALAEOS: The Trace of Life on Earth

Mammaliformes: Docodonta

Transitional Fossil Species And Modes of Speciation

Evolution and the Fossil Record

Smooth Change in the Fossil Record

Transitional fossil sequence from dinosaur to bird

Transitional fossil sequence from fish to elephant

Transitional Vertebrate Fossils FAQ

[King Prout]

yeah, gotta do some trollhunting pinglist housekeeping, and then I'm out for the night, too.

seeya round, moog.

[RunningWolf]

You know moog,

I have not read enough to know 'which side' you are on, But I like what I see!!

frisky alert Wolf sparkle in eye, pant pant pant

Wolf

[moog]

night

[King Prout]

thanks, again. of course, they won't be read by the other addressed recipient, you realize?

[King Prout]

tape?
I am often puzzled, but seldom stumped.
ya got me.
tape?

[moog]

You know moog, I have not read enough to know 'which side' you are on, But I like what I see!! frisky alert Wolf sparkle in eye, pant pant pant Wolf Thanks...I think:). Actually, I'm a pretty staunch ID'er, but I don't have a problem learning evolution nor with science. I am content that I know what my beliefs are and I have faith in them and I allow others to have their own beliefs about the creation--one thing that people don't point out is that among creationists there are a lot of differences too. We talked about it once in Sunday School and each of the 10 people had 10 different opinions. We've used science in about every convenience we have today and will have.

I think sometimes we can get too much into something and forget some of the things that really matter in life. That's where I want to put my focus.

Oh crap, I've gotten too serious for too long. Thanks for the comment.

Glad you "wear" pants.

[moog]

tape?
I am often puzzled, but seldom stumped.
ya got me.
tape?

Well, you had to make that dirt look like hair SOME way didn't you?:) Tape hurts when it comes off a chest. hehe.

[King Prout]

Tape hurts when it comes off a chest. hehe.

not being a metrosexual, I wouldn't know ;)

(BURN!)

[Ichneumon]

thanks, again. of course, they won't be read by the other addressed recipient, you realize?

I'm well aware of how they maintain their false beliefs about there being "no evidence" for evolution.

[King Prout]

ah.
doin' it fer tha lurkers.
gotcha.

[reasonmclucus]

You have it backwards. It's the Darwinist religious fanatics who are ignorant, dishonest or both. Darwinism is a religious belief that has nothing to do with science. Darwinists have adopted the beliefs of various groups and covered them with a pseudo scientific veneer. The idea that current species once looked different comes from various North American beliefs. The idea of humans being descended from monkeys/apes comes from ancient Tibetan beliefs. The Darwinist belief that all life has a common origin is pure religion and is scientifically impossible if life developed without the aid of some Intelligence. A "natural" process would have been able to produce many different life forms from scratch independently from each over a long period of time. The life forms observed after mass extinctions could have developed from scratch as new species if life developed "naturally". Most Darwinists seem incapable of understanding what Intelligent Design means. I.D. looks at biological life and recognizes that the only physical systems that are comparable to biological organisms in terms of structure and regularity of operation are the machines constructed by human beings, generally considered to be intelligent beings. The biological cell is a biochemical computer with molecular memory that is organized in a manner that can be expressed as "0's" and "1's".

[moog]

I asked your old French girlfriend. Hehe.

[King Prout]

oh, my...
look at 358.
that CAN'T be sincere.
can it?