Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pat Buchanan: Might the Arabs Have a Point?
The American Conservative ^ | 16 January 2006 | Patrick J. Buchanan

Posted on 01/16/2006 1:26:24 PM PST by Hal1950

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280 ... 341-355 next last
To: saveliberty

Joe Kennedy actually loved Jews one day of the year: election day. He probably had more mixed views on Primary day. The other 363 days of the year however...


241 posted on 01/16/2006 3:53:55 PM PST by Clemenza (Smartest words ever written by a Communist: "Show me the way to the next Whiskey Bar")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: Hal1950
Fully 76 percent [of Arabs] said the Americans are there for the oil, 68 percent said to protect Israel, 63 percent to dominate the region, and 59 percent to weaken the Muslim world.

Closely resembling the views of Western leftists.

242 posted on 01/16/2006 3:54:17 PM PST by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

Patty has turned into this era's answer to Henry Ford.


243 posted on 01/16/2006 3:58:39 PM PST by WestVirginiaRebel (The Democratic Party-Jackass symbol, jackass leaders, jackass supporters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 242 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare

BTTT


Nice.....


244 posted on 01/16/2006 4:00:48 PM PST by MikefromOhio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 239 | View Replies]

To: MikeinIraq

Thanks.

Once in awhile I might come up with something useful.
*chuckle*


245 posted on 01/16/2006 4:04:56 PM PST by Darksheare (Tagline subverted for nefarious plans of nefariousness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 244 | View Replies]

To: Hal1950
Unkindest cut of all, Arabs would prefer that President Chirac and France lead the world rather than us, and, rather than have us as the world’s lone superpower, they would prefer the Chinese.

The Arabs really like and respect Chirac and France, huh? Rioting and burning down entire villages is a mighty funny way of showing it!

246 posted on 01/16/2006 4:05:24 PM PST by jpl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth

Oil, obviously, and I said "possibly" unjustified. We haven't the backbone to develop our own reserves; and name any nation which does not harbor at least some greedy politicians or special interest groups with significant influence on foreign policy who would gladly advocate war if it served their own special interests regardless of more legitimate motives being decisive.

"After all, before liberating Kuwait, Secretary of State Baker said the coming war was about “o-i-l.” And while we sent half a million troops to rescue that nation of 1.5 million, we sent none to Rwanda, where perhaps that many people were massacred."

I'm suggesting that Pat's analysis is not just useless verbiage for the dump heap.


247 posted on 01/16/2006 4:05:59 PM PST by Sir Charles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare

LOL

yeah just "once" in a while :)

You notice that this troll errr Buchanan-supporter (kinda like athletic supporter huh?) hasn't said anything to support himself, except to use the usual troll lines, just as you said?

I really wonder what his previous handle was....


248 posted on 01/16/2006 4:06:25 PM PST by MikefromOhio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 245 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Tracey had a busy day:

I love her. The quotes today are real stingers.

249 posted on 01/16/2006 4:07:09 PM PST by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies]

To: theFIRMbss
If we were living in 1933, Pat would be "wondering" if maybe, somehow, the Jews really were the root of Germany's grief

"Would be"? He is.

250 posted on 01/16/2006 4:07:30 PM PST by steve-b (A desire not to butt into other people's business is eighty percent of all human wisdom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Bahbah

See the post to me above that, I think, answers this question.


251 posted on 01/16/2006 4:07:42 PM PST by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: Paperdoll
I offer no apologies for my explanation. Maybe the words could have been more artful, but I am not a democrat.
252 posted on 01/16/2006 4:09:40 PM PST by Prost1 (Sandy Berger can steal, Clinton can cheat, but Bush can't listen!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 238 | View Replies]

To: MikeinIraq

That is a bit of a question, yes.

Remember 'Chrysler813/Lumina813' from last year?
Apparently he came back earlier today.
I'll ping you to it if you aren't there already.


253 posted on 01/16/2006 4:09:41 PM PST by Darksheare (Tagline subverted for nefarious plans of nefariousness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 248 | View Replies]

To: MikeinIraq

:-) Glad to help you, sir!


254 posted on 01/16/2006 4:10:08 PM PST by saveliberty (Proud to be Head Snowflake, Bushbot and a new member of Sam's Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare

yeah I went and read that....

very interesting indeed.


255 posted on 01/16/2006 4:10:59 PM PST by MikefromOhio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 253 | View Replies]

To: MikeinIraq

They're out lately.
Must be the full moon.


256 posted on 01/16/2006 4:11:36 PM PST by Darksheare (Tagline subverted for nefarious plans of nefariousness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 255 | View Replies]

To: Hal1950

257 posted on 01/16/2006 4:12:12 PM PST by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmericaUnited

Now comparing Pukeannan to Algore is just wrong. At least Pat destroyed the Reform Party!

Pray for W and Our Freedom Fighters


258 posted on 01/16/2006 4:12:21 PM PST by bray (President Bush Protects America. The Rats Protect Terrorists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare

See my 247 reply.

Thanks for looking me up. Actually I lurk a lot without signing in. I sort of lost interest after the 100th time reading comments like "it's all Bush's fault" and "Tom Daschel is deeply saddened".


259 posted on 01/16/2006 4:12:22 PM PST by Sir Charles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare

"I've known [Pat] now for twenty-five years. We have agreed on almost nothing, starting with Richard Nixon . . , there's not a scintilla of evidence in all I've known about Pat that he is anti-Semitic . . , This is an attempt to say that if you disagree with Israel on a matter of policy, you can be called anti-Semitic..."
Jack Germond, Baltimore Sun columnist

http://www.nizkor.org/hweb/people/b/buchanan-pat/buchanan-on-buchanan.html

Website explaining what you may have misunderstood to be Pat's anti-semitism.

I do not support the murderous actions of "Palestinians", nor am I a "terrorist sympathizer" as you unfortunately imply. I too am a conservative who believes in the American constitution, the American republic, and defending our traditional American way of life. I simply am not convinced Pat is an anti-semite.


260 posted on 01/16/2006 4:12:49 PM PST by spoolmak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 239 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280 ... 341-355 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson