1 posted on
01/16/2006 9:53:42 AM PST by
Paul Ross
To: Paul Ross
In other words, real science can expect to suffer (as always) because it's important to maintain the illusion of a manned space program.
2 posted on
01/16/2006 9:58:23 AM PST by
saganite
(The poster formerly known as Arkie 2)
To: Paul Ross
the growth of science in NASA has been in the 5-7% range LOL
We can buy anything in America.
5 posted on
01/16/2006 10:14:25 AM PST by
RightWhale
(pas de lieu, Rhone que nous)
To: Paul Ross
Translation: "You can ask for Pluto, but we're gonna hand you Uranus..."
6 posted on
01/16/2006 10:19:18 AM PST by
talleyman
(Kerry & the Surrender-Donkey Treasoncrats - trashing the troops for 40 years.)
To: Paul Ross
Griffin Tells Astronomers To Lower Expectations Lower as in Beneath the Moon or Just Over Everest?
8 posted on
01/16/2006 10:20:23 AM PST by
Doctor Stochastic
(Vegetabilisch = chaotisch ist der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
To: Paul Ross
...questions like "What is dark energy?"![Image hosting by TinyPic](http://tinypic.com/kcm0dk.jpg)
14 posted on
01/16/2006 10:38:56 AM PST by
randog
(What the....?!)
To: RightWhale; Brett66; xrp; gdc314; anymouse; NonZeroSum; jimkress; discostu; The_Victor; ...
Excellent...
![](http://kevincdavis.net/spaceping.jpg)
15 posted on
01/16/2006 10:41:25 AM PST by
KevinDavis
(http://www.cafepress.com/spacefuture)
To: Paul Ross
A little off base but it is an Astronomy thread.
![](http://www.gizwizbiz.com/images/198_SkyScout.jpg)
The Celestron SkyScout makes great use of GPS. Look at the night sky through this handheld gizmo and it can tell you what you are looking at. The screen gives you the name of the star, the planet, etc. and it will also talk to you and give you the same info. Since its knows the date, the SkyScout can also tell you whats available where you are and tell you which way to turn to see particular objects. (You follow the arrows in the viewfinder) If you like, you can download new tours and data to an SD card via computer. Now when you look up in the sky you wont have to guess at what youre seeing. Coming in March for under $400.
SkyScout
To: Paul Ross
The first people to establish a stable base at the lunar pole (where the ice is) will own the next century.
NASA seems to be doing the right thing, bizarrely - though probably too expensively as usual. Anyway: science is one thing, but the high ground needs to be seized.
26 posted on
01/16/2006 11:07:12 AM PST by
agere_contra
(Protectionism is Socialism - it's welfare for uncompetitive people.)
To: RightWhale
Griffin drew applause when he reminded his audience that he reversed a decision by his predecessor not to send another space shuttle mission to service the Hubble telescope... [b]ut he cautioned that the final Hubble servicing mission, tentatively scheduled before the end of next year, will be launched only "if at all possible." And he said bluntly that there is no way from an engineering standpoint to mount a robotic servicing mission, as former Administrator Sean O'Keefe opted to do, that could do more than deorbit the telescope safely before it is expected to become uncontrollable.
The Hubble can be relaunched using a Big Dumb Booster, but only brought back to Earth using the Shuttle (at this time). If it can be brought down, it should be refitted a bit, to make it easy to upgrade and repair in space suits and/or by robots, so that it need never be brought down again. The alternative is to build a big enclosure, launch that, deactivate the Hubble, bring the Hubble inside the enclosure, and shut the door. When possible, the repairs and upgrades can be done in a shirtsleeve environment in orbit, then the Hubble can be returned to service, and the repair station moved lower and out of the way.
58 posted on
01/16/2006 8:27:50 PM PST by
SunkenCiv
(In the long run, there is only the short run.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson