Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: presidio9
Now you are just being argumentative. People pay to get their responses higher up on Google. The point was that I don't need to sustantiate marijuana's link to ED, because it is well established beginner-level bio-chemistry. The subject is not open to debate.

If it's not debatable because of a overwhelming preponderance of peer-reviewed research clearly proves the assertion, then finding a citation (or a dozen) should be trivial.

Questioning it is like demanding proof that twinkies make you fat. Tell yuo what. See if you can find me a reputible scientist who refutes it.

Tell you what, when you find a reputable scientist that claims it, I'll start searching for a scientist to refute it. No need to refute rumor and myth.

Meanwhile I will parse the list I provided, but then you're on your own:

Nothing here looks scientific.

150 posted on 01/16/2006 10:30:35 AM PST by cryptical
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies ]


To: cryptical

Staying in denial won't help your cause. Neither will summarily dismissing 560,000 hits all saying the same thing because you don't think any of them are "scientific." Find me a few thousand pro-drug studies that ravesabout the rock-hard boners pot bestows and then we'll talk.


152 posted on 01/16/2006 10:34:58 AM PST by presidio9 (Si hoc legere scis nimium eruditionis habes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson