OMG.
Wow - that famous "logic" of yours just got a big fat "F".
1. There is NOWHERE that I've said if a vet is a good Republican, they will do nothing for fear of embarrassing the party. That's a flat out lie. Or else you're reading comprehension is even worse than I thought.
2. I've said that veterans should handle it but the Republican party needs to stay far away from it. If that stifles the veterans so much that they are afraid to debate it here, they really are weenies, aren't they?
3. Honey, you need a good night's sleep and try again in the morning. That was a pathetic attempt. Just pathetic.
It's implied in every time you've said that republicans should do nothing about Muthra.
I've made my case and proved it as well.
"I've said that veterans should handle it but the Republican party needs to stay far away from it. If that stifles the veterans so much that they are afraid to debate it here, they really are weenies, aren't they?"
pathetic weenies ARE NOT afraid to debate it here.
the arguements with tonk and usmcobra are "stifling the veterans", etc., would WOULD like to discuss it.
move on.
"I've said that veterans should handle it but the Republican party needs to stay far away from it."
UH OH Peach!
"Murtha also told differing stories about when and where he was wounded in action. A Pittsburgh Post-Gazette story reported in 2002 that Murtha had facial lacerations. In 1994, the Uniontown (Pa.) Herald-Standard quoted Murtha saying he was “wounded in the arm” for one medal and “my knee was banged up and my arm was banged up when a helicopter was shot down” for the other. Then, Morano and Hall uncovered a June 1, 1967 report in the Johnstown (Pa.) Tribune-Democrat quoting from a letter from Murtha to his wife describing his injuries as being "struck in the ankle" by a "shot that ricocheted off the helicopter."
Murtha’s Mangled Medal Stories
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1560074/posts
Now what was that about there was no proof about what?