I said that you said that you want vets to handle it.
The Vets here are discussing it and you are trying to prevent any discussion of it by saying that republicans should stay way from it.
Your point being that if a Vet is a "good" republican they will do nothing about Muthra for fear of embarassing the party.
Ergo you are trying to prevent what you are saying you want to happen I.E. Vets doing anything about Muthra.
See how hard it is to explain to you, your own words, even you don't know what you are saying.
In my mind, loyalty to the Party above all else, is a sure sign that the person making such a restriction on others is beyond the shadow any doubt a liberal.
For the simple reason that most republicans don't believe in such union thug/commissar/mafioso tactics of loyalty, republicans are loyal to conservative ideas and not to the party.
OMG.
Wow - that famous "logic" of yours just got a big fat "F".
1. There is NOWHERE that I've said if a vet is a good Republican, they will do nothing for fear of embarrassing the party. That's a flat out lie. Or else you're reading comprehension is even worse than I thought.
2. I've said that veterans should handle it but the Republican party needs to stay far away from it. If that stifles the veterans so much that they are afraid to debate it here, they really are weenies, aren't they?
3. Honey, you need a good night's sleep and try again in the morning. That was a pathetic attempt. Just pathetic.